I have never seen a solid definition of what these objects are actually defined as or what they contain.
2026-04-24 23:39:23.1777073963
What are the solid definitions of algebraic number fields $\mathbb{Q}(\theta)$ and $\mathbb{Q}(\theta, \phi)$
50 Views Asked by user634691 https://math.techqa.club/user/user634691/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in NUMBER-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Show that $(x,y,z)$ is a primitive Pythagorean triple then either $x$ or $y$ is divisible by $3$.
- About polynomial value being perfect power.
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- What is the smallest integer $N>2$, such that $x^5+y^5 = N$ has a rational solution?
- Integer from base 10 to base 2
- How do I show that any natural number of this expression is a natural linear combination?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
Related Questions in FIELD-THEORY
- Square classes of a real closed field
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Proving addition is associative in $\mathbb{R}$
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible for an infinite field that does not contain a subfield isomorphic to $\Bbb Q$?
- Proving that the fraction field of a $k[x,y]/(f)$ is isomorphic to $k(t)$
- Finding a generator of GF(16)*
- Operator notation for arbitrary fields
- Studying the $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ when $p(x)$ is any degree.
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-NUMBER-THEORY
- Splitting of a prime in a number field
- algebraic integers of $x^4 -10x^2 +1$
- Writing fractions in number fields with coprime numerator and denominator
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Introduction to jacobi modular forms
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Find the degree of the algebraic numbers
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- Direct product and absolut norm
- Splitting of primes in a Galois extension
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
"Never have seen a solid definition". Werd, because this is the most basic notion at the starting point of all algebraic number theory.
1) If the elements added to $k$ are supposed to live in some ambient unspecified field $K$, then $k(\theta),k(\theta,\phi)$, etc. denote the smallest subfields containing $k$ and these elements, independently of any property of algebraicity or transcendance. The notations $k(X), k(X,Y)$, etc. (with capital letters) should be reserved for the fields of rational fractions in $X, (X,Y)$, etc. with coefficients in $k$. One defines analogously the rings $k[X]$ (=ring of polynomials) and $k[\theta]$ (= smallest subring, etc.) Note that the fields $k(X), k(\theta)$ are the fields of fractions of the rings $k[X]$ and $k[\theta]$.
2) The distinction between "algebraic" and "trancendental" appears with the notion of an annihilating (resp. minimal) polynomial $f(X)$ (resp. $m(X)$) of $\theta$. Because of the "universal property" of the polynomials, there exists a surjective homomorphism of rings $\Psi : k[X]\to k[\theta]$, with Ker $\psi = (m(X))$, the principal ideal generated by $m(X)$ (this comes from euclidian division), so that $k[X]/(m(X))\cong k[\theta]$. If $m(X)$ is the zero polynomial, then $k[X]\cong k[\theta]$, hence $k(X)\cong k(\theta)$, and $\theta$ is called transcendental over $k$. If $m(X)$ is not zero, its minimality implies its irreducibility, hence the maximality of the ideal $(m(X))$, so that $k[X]/(m(X))$ is a field, $k[\theta]=k(\theta)$, and $\theta$ is called algebraic over $k$.
3) In a last step, we must prove the existence of an ambient field $K$. If $\theta$ is transcendental, no problem, just take $K=k(X)$. If $\theta$ is algebraic, it is certainly shown in your course (using the axiom of choice ?) that an "algebraic closure" $k^{alg}$ of $k$ can be constructed, and one just take $K=k^{alg}$ ./.