Suppose you have a Noetherian topological space $X$, and its finitely many irreducible components are $X_1,\dots,X_n$. If $U\subseteq X$ is open, why are the irreducible components of $U$ precisely the intersections $U\cap X_i$ which aren't empty?
The thing that's tripping me up is I don't see how to go from components in $U$ to those in $X$. For suppose $U\cap X_i=(U\cap Z_1)\cup(U\cap Z_2)$, where $Z_1,Z_2$ are closed in $X$. To show $U\cap X_i$ is irreducible, it has to be either $U\cap Z_1$ or $U\cap Z_2$. If not, there exist points $x,y\in U$ where $x\in X_i\setminus Z_1$ and $y\in X_i\setminus Z_2$. My hunch says there should be a way to go up and find a proper decomposition of $X_i$ in $X$ as a union of closed sets to get a contradiction.
I run into the same issue trying to show $U\cap X_i$ is maximal among irreducible sets in $U$.
What's the right way to see this property?
Replacing $X$ by $X_i$ and $U$ by $U \cap X_i$ you only have to prove that for any irreducible space $X$ and any nonempty open subset $U \subseteq X$, $U$ is also irreducible. If $U = (U \cap Z_1) \cup (U \cap Z_2)$ for some closed subsets $Z_1$, $Z_2$ of $X$, then the closure $\overline{U}$ of $U$ in $X$ is $\overline{U \cap Z_1} \cup \overline{U \cap Z_2}$. As $U$ is a nonempty open subset of an irreducible space, in particular dense in $X$, this implies $\overline{U \cap Z_1} \cup \overline{U \cap Z_2} = X$ and irreducibility gives us (say) $X = \overline{U \cap Z_1}$. Intersecting with $U$ now gives $U = U \cap Z_1$.