I am reading about fibred categories. After reading the definition of "vertical" morphism, I can imagine why they are named like that. What about "cartesian" morphisms? What is cartesian about them? I don't know much mathematics besides some basic abstract algebra.
2026-04-08 05:44:54.1775627094
Why is a cartesian morphism called cartesian?
912 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SOFT-QUESTION
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Online resources for networking and creating new mathematical collaborations
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
- How do you prevent being lead astray when you're working on a problem that takes months/years?
- Is it impossible to grasp Multivariable Calculus with poor prerequisite from Single variable calculus?
- A definite integral of a rational function: How can this be transformed from trivial to obvious by a change in viewpoint?
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in INTUITION
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Intuition for $\int_Cz^ndz$ for $n=-1, n\neq -1$
- Intuition on Axiom of Completeness (Lower Bounds)
- What is the point of the maximum likelihood estimator?
- Why are functions of compact support so important?
- What is it, intuitively, that makes a structure "topological"?
- geometric view of similar vs congruent matrices
- Weighted average intuition
- a long but quite interesting adding and deleting balls problem
- What does it mean, intuitively, to have a differential form on a Manifold (example inside)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $\mathcal C$ be a category. A Cartesian square is a commutative square$\require{AMScd}$
\begin{CD} A @>a>> B\\@VVbV @VVcV\\ C @>d>> D \end{CD}
that is universal with respect to all commutative squares having the same bottom right hand corner. This means that if we have any commutative square of the form
\begin{CD} F @>f>> B\\@VVgV @VVcV\\ C @>d>> D \end{CD}
then there is a unique morphism $h\colon F\to A$ such that $b\circ h=g$ and $a\circ h=f$. As far as I know, the reason that these diagrams are called Cartesian is that one special example is given by the Cartesian product $A\times B$ of two sets:
\begin{CD} A\times B @>\text{pr}_1>> A\\@VV\text{pr}_2V @VVV\\ B @>>> \{*\} \end{CD}
What has this to do with Cartesian morphisms? If $\mathcal C$ is a category, then we can define the arrow category $\mathcal C^{\to}$ whose objects are morphisms $A\xrightarrow{a}B$ in $\mathcal C$ and where the morphisms from $A\xrightarrow{a}B$ to $C\xrightarrow{d}D$ are commutative squares:
\begin{CD} A @>a>> B\\@VVbV @VVcV\\ C @>d>> D \end{CD}
The arrow category is a prototypical example of a fibred category (as long as enough fibre products exist in the base category $\mathcal C$). There is a natural functor $p\colon\mathcal C^{\to}\to\mathcal C$ sending $A\xrightarrow{a}B$ to $B$ and the commutative diagram above to its right hand column. With respect to this functor, the morphisms in $\mathcal C^\to$ called Cartesian are precisely the Cartesian squares. The terminology has carried over to general fibred categories.