It's easy to understand that cardinality is submodular, but how can it be supermodular at the same time? The supermodular function of the cardinality is the opposite of its submodular function, then I thought it would never be submodular again. It's very incomprehensible for me that a function can be both submodular and supermodular, or called modular, so could anyone please instantiate and exemplify it. Thanks.
2026-03-25 12:32:41.1774441961
Why is the cardinality both supermodular and submodular(or modular)?
386 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Calculation of distance of a point from a curve
- Find all local maxima and minima of $x^2+y^2$ subject to the constraint $x^2+2y=6$. Does $x^2+y^2$ have a global max/min on the same constraint?
- What does it mean to dualize a constraint in the context of Lagrangian relaxation?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Building the model for a Linear Programming Problem
- Maximize the function
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
Related Questions in SELF-LEARNING
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- How do you prevent being lead astray when you're working on a problem that takes months/years?
- how to solve Lazy janitor problem
- How deep do you have to go before you can contribute to the research frontier
- Use the binomial theorem to prove that for $n$ a positive integer the following holds
- Am I right or wrong in this absolute value?
- good introduction to algebra over a field?
- What are the mathematical topics most essential for an applied mathematician?
- Are there any analysis textbooks like Charles Pinter's A book of abstract algebra?
- How to use the AOPS books?
Related Questions in CONVEX-OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) Line Fitting / Regression
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
- Can a linear matrix inequality constraint transform to second-order cone constraint(s)?
- Optimality conditions - necessary vs sufficient
- Minimization of a convex quadratic form
- Prove that the objective function of K-means is non convex
- How to solve a linear program without any given data?
- Distance between a point $x \in \mathbb R^2$ and $x_1^2+x_2^2 \le 4$
Related Questions in MATROIDS
- Do these special substring sets form a matroid?
- how to prove that the dual of a matroid satisfies the exchange property?
- Proof of uniform matrix being transversal matrix by selecting singletons
- Smallest matroid containing two disjoint maximal elements of cardinality $K$?
- How much does the number of connected components of a graph grow in the case below?
- Given bases $A$, $B$ of a matroid there is a one-to-one mapping $\omega$ from $A$ to $B$ such that $(A - {a}) \cup {\omega(a)}$ is independent
- How to list all circuits of an oriented matroid and all circuits of its contraction of a vertex by hand?
- Relationship between Affine Dependence and Linear Dependence in Oriented Matroids?
- Contraction of oriented matroid as related to polytope?
- Why is this not a matroid?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Note that a function $f \colon \def\P{\mathfrak P}\P(\Omega) \to \mathbf R$ is submodular iff $$ f(S) + f(T) \ge f(S\cap T) + f(S \cup T), \qquad S,T \subseteq \Omega\tag 1 $$ and supermodular iff the reverse inequality $$ f(S) + f(T) \le f(S\cap T) + f(S \cup T), \qquad S,T \subseteq \Omega \tag 2$$ holds.
Now consider cardinality, denoted by $f(S) = |S|$. It is well-known, that $$ |S| + |T| = |S \cap T| + |S\cup T| \tag 3$$ holds (we will prove it later). Hence, $f=|\cdot|$ fulfills both inequalities (1) and (2), as it has equality in both cases.
To prove (3) note that $$ S \cup T = (S \cap T) \cup (S\setminus T) \cup (T \setminus S) $$ and the three sets are disjoint. Hence, $$ |S\cup T| = |S\cap T| + |S \setminus T| + |T \setminus S| \tag 4$$ just by counting elements. As $$ S = (S\cap T) \cup (S \setminus T) $$ is also a disjoint union $$ |S| = |S \cap T| + |S \setminus T| \tag{5a} $$ Along the same line of thought $$ |T| = |S \cap T| + |T \setminus S|\tag{5b} $$ Now use eqns. (5) in (4), we get $$ |S\cup T| = |S\cap T| + |S| - |S\cap T| + |T| - |S \cap T| \iff |S\cup T| + |S\cap T| = |S| + |T| $$ which proves (3).