Why must there be an infinite number of lines in an absolute geometry? I see that there must be an infinite number of points pretty trivially due to the protractor postulate, and there are an infinite number of real numbers. Hence, theres an infinite number of points, but why must there be an infinite number of lines? Does it follow from the existence axiom where two distinct points completely determine the existence of a line between these two points?
2026-03-25 22:26:31.1774477591
Why must there be an infinite number of lines in an absolute geometry?
2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in EUCLIDEAN-GEOMETRY
- Visualization of Projective Space
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
- Circle inside kite inside larger circle
- If in a triangle ABC, ∠B = 2∠C and the bisector of ∠B meets CA in D, then the ratio BD : DC would be equal to?
- Euclidean Fifth Postulate
- JMO geometry Problem.
- Measure of the angle
- Difference between parallel and Equal lines
- Complex numbers - prove |BD| + |CD| = |AD|
- Find the ratio of segments using Ceva's theorem
Related Questions in MATH-HISTORY
- Are there negative prime numbers?
- University math curriculum focused on (or inclusive of) "great historical works" of math?
- Did Grothendieck acknowledge his collaborators' intellectual contributions?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
- What about the 'geometry' in 'geometric progression'?
- Discovery of the first Janko Group
- Has miscommunication ever benefited mathematics? Let's list examples.
- Neumann Theorem about finite unions of cosets
- What is Euler doing?
- A book that shows history of mathematics and how ideas were formed?
Related Questions in NONEUCLIDEAN-GEOMETRY
- Sharing endpoint at infinity
- Why don't we have many non euclidean geometries out there?
- Construction of Parallel Lines in Absolute Geometry
- Why is the mirror descent considered a "non-Euclidean" algorithm?
- How does a polar triangle characterize/ define a hyperbolic ellipse?
- Why is the hyperbolic plane homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^2$, whilst the 2-sphere isn't?
- Is Non-Euclidean geometry really "Non"?
- Isometries on the Hyperbolic Plane
- Relation between curvature on surface, curvature of surface in space, and curvature of space
- Use scale in projection to solve for curvature
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Pick one point $P$. Through $P$ and each other point $Q$ there's a line, $\ell_Q$, by axiom 1.
Case 1: There are infinitely many $\ell_Q$, and we're done.
Case 2: There are finitely many lines $\ell_X$. In that case, one of them -- say $\ell_Q$ -- must contain infinitely many points $R_1, R_2, \ldots$. (Because we know that the geometry has infinitely many points, and each point $X \ne P$ is on $\ell_X$.) Now let $S$ be a point not on $\ell_Q$. Then the lines $SR_i$ are all distinct. (For if $SR_1$ and $SR_2$ shared a point $R_k$ for some $k \ne 1, 2$, we'd have $R_1$ and $R_k$ on both $SR_1$ and on $\ell_Q$, a contradiction.) Hence in this case there are infinitely many lines as well.