For the simplex method, we need to add slack variables. My question is how to determine how many slack variables should be considered in the LP problem? I don't quite get why in the cases to find out the minimum objective function with the lower bounded constraint, the number of slack variable is $2n$ where $n$ is the number of constraints. while in the max objective function with upper bounded constraint, the number of slack variable is $n$. Did I miss something about the simplex method?
2026-03-30 21:07:15.1774904835
A question about the operation research and simplex method
3.6k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Calculation of distance of a point from a curve
- Find all local maxima and minima of $x^2+y^2$ subject to the constraint $x^2+2y=6$. Does $x^2+y^2$ have a global max/min on the same constraint?
- What does it mean to dualize a constraint in the context of Lagrangian relaxation?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Building the model for a Linear Programming Problem
- Maximize the function
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
Related Questions in LINEAR-PROGRAMMING
- Proving dual convex cone property
- Linear algebra: what is the purpose of passive transformation matrix?
- Building the model for a Linear Programming Problem
- Show that $ \ x_ 0 \ $ cannot be an optimal solution
- Is there any way to model this situation in integer programming?
- How to Solve a Linear Programming Problem in $n$ Dimension Space?
- How to solve a linear program without any given data?
- Constraints for continuous path within graph with at least one obligatory node in path
- Select the smallest strict positive value from a list of variables in a linear program.
- How to add nonnegative constraint to an LP problem
Related Questions in OPERATIONS-RESEARCH
- correctness for minimizing average completition time for scheduling problem with release times
- the effect of an operation
- Reasonable/unreasonable exponentially distributed interarrival (service) times
- Optimally allocating inventory, does this problem have a name?
- Linear Programming: What is the rationale behind the Gauss Jordan Row operations we do after determining the leaving and entering variables?
- Linear programming: Converting nested absolute value
- How to find infinite optimal solutions for linear program?
- Ways to speed up solving an LP with Google's ortools
- A Mixed Integer Model with Mixed Integer sub-Problems
- Does zero considered as a leaving variable in simplex method?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Slack variables are introduced to convert your LP model into standard form. The design of the simplex method calls for your model to be of the standard form $Max/Min$ $z=c^Tx$ subject to $Ax=b, x\ge 0$. By introducing extra variables which take up the 'slack' in the inequality you get a model where there are only equalities and which is of the requisite standard form. It is easily established that both problems have the same feasible set, thereby the same solutions.
Your second question stems from confusing $\le$ type inequalities with $\ge$ inequalities. In case you have an inequality of the sort $2x+3y+4z\le 5$ you can add the slack variable $s$ on the left hand side to get an equation $2x+3y+4z+s=5$. In case your inequality was $2x+3y+4z\ge 5$ you can add the slack variable $s$ on the right hand side to get an equation $2x+3y+4z=5+s$ or equivalently $2x+3y+4z-s=5$. (We add the slack on the right since in this case the right hand side represented a quantity which was less and so needed the slack.)
Now the issue with $\ge$ is that it yields equations of the sort where the slack variable is being "subtracted" from the left hand side instead of being added. I will not go into details, but the usual application of the simplex algorithm fundamentally depends on the slack variable being "added" instead of being subtracted. Hence the $\ge$ represents the problem. To make the algorithm work "artificial variables" are further added to such equations. These behave just like the slack variables. So for example, $2x+3y+4z\ge 5$ will be changed to $2x+3y+4z-s+A= 5$ where $A$ is the new artificial variable. Introduction of these artificial variables is permitted since through a clever manipulation it is ensured that these variables are zero in the optimum solution. The net effect is that two variables per $\ge$ inequality are introduced in the problem, whereas only one variable per $\le$ inequality is introduced.
You have probably encountered maximization problems with only $\le$ constraints and minimization problems with only $\ge$ constraints. The number of slack variables has nothing to do with maximization or minimization, but as explained above has to do with the $\le$ or $\ge$ sign in the constraints.