I’ve seen that $\mathbb{R}^*$ isn’t complete as many Cauchy sequences won’t converge, and that includes power series. In other stack exchange posts, I’ve seen that even the exponential function won’t converge if the sum is only taken over the natural numbers, but will converge when taken over all hypernatural numbers. This got me thinking if that’s the answer to the completeness problem on the hyperreals. Would using these longer sequences ensure completeness?
2026-03-27 09:20:01.1774603201
Can the hyperreal numbers have a property akin to completeness by considering hypernatural sequences?
81 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ANALYSIS
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- conformal mapping and rational function
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- How to prove that $E_P(\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{G})$ is not equal to $0$
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
Related Questions in CONVERGENCE-DIVERGENCE
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Conditions for the convergence of :$\cos\left( \sum_{n\geq0}{a_n}x^n\right)$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Pointwise and uniform convergence of function series $f_n = x^n$
- studying the convergence of a series:
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- If $a_{1}>2$and $a_{n+1}=a_{n}^{2}-2$ then Find $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}$ $\frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}......a_{n}}$
- Convergence radius of power series can be derived from root and ratio test.
- Does this sequence converge? And if so to what?
- Seeking an example of Schwartz function $f$ such that $ \int_{\bf R}\left|\frac{f(x-y)}{y}\right|\ dy=\infty$
Related Questions in FIELD-THEORY
- Square classes of a real closed field
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Proving addition is associative in $\mathbb{R}$
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible for an infinite field that does not contain a subfield isomorphic to $\Bbb Q$?
- Proving that the fraction field of a $k[x,y]/(f)$ is isomorphic to $k(t)$
- Finding a generator of GF(16)*
- Operator notation for arbitrary fields
- Studying the $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ when $p(x)$ is any degree.
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
Related Questions in NONSTANDARD-ANALYSIS
- Is this result related to the Taylor series?
- Multiplication property of equality for infinitesimals
- Textbook recommendation for non-standard analysis
- Applying ultrapower construction to the field $\mathbb {Q} $ of rationals
- Physical Calculator with Hyperreals and Multiple Dimensions?
- Epsilon-Delta Continuity in Hyperreals
- Is $\approx$ actually an entourage?
- Nonstandard Extension of the Characteristic Function
- How are infinite sums in nonstandard analysis defined?
- Searching for an example of a theorem wich is "easy" to prove in a classical way but way more difficult in the setting of non-standard analysis.
Related Questions in ORDERED-FIELDS
- Embedding from Rational Numbers to Ordered Field is Order Preserving
- Ordered field with a maximum value
- Can algebraic numbers be compared using only rational arithmetic?
- Completeness of $\Bbb R(x)$?
- Does every ordered divisible abelian group admit an expansion (and how many) to an ordered field?
- Category theory and real closed fields
- Number of orbits of the natural action of order preserving bijections of $\mathbb Q$ on $\mathbb Q^n$
- well ordering principle and ordered field
- If $S<G:=\text{Gal}(E/R)$ is a Sylow 2-subgroup, then $[\text{Fix}_E(S):R] = [G:S]$
- Trouble constructing an ordered set that is not directed
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Working in nonstandard analysis, it is customary to extend many notions, such as that of a sequence or of a Cauchy sequence, by taking the *-transform of the corresponding notion in the standard world (a disclaimer: for the sake of simplicity, in this answer I use "standard" as a synonym for "belonging to the superstructure based on the usual real numbers". This is, unfortunately, not the only meaning of this term).
The standard notion of a sequence is that of a function $f: \mathbb{N}\to \mathbb{R}$, so the corresponding notion of *sequence in nonstandard analysis is $f:\ \!^*\mathbb{N}\to\ \!^*\mathbb{R}$ that satisfy an additional technical hypothesis that I will discuss below. Once this has been done enough times, the * is usually omitted: in nonstandard analysis, the word "sequence" is shorthand for "*sequence". One extends the notion of Cauchy sequence in the same way. With these caveats, the transfer principle entails that all Cauchy sequences converge (actually, there is no need to use the transfer principle since the *-transform of the usual proof is correct as well).
I mentioned the transfer principle because it ties in with the answer to the second part of your question: it is not the use of "long sequences" that ensures completeness of $\ \! ^*\mathbb{R}$, but the use of internal sequences (this is the technical hypothesis that was needed above). Basically, the transfer principle states that rules, laws or procedures valid for the real numbers, still apply (i.e., are ‘transferred’) to the hyperreals, provided that one works only with internal objects.
Functions $f: \mathbb{N}\to\ \! ^*\mathbb{R}$ are not internal, so the transfer principle does not apply to them. Notice also that there are also some functions $f:\ \!^*\mathbb{N}\to\ \!^*\mathbb{R}$ that are not internal, such as $f(n)=0$ if $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $f(n)=n$ if $n \in \ \!^*\mathbb{N} \setminus \mathbb{N}$. The transfer principle does not apply to those, as well.
The definition of an internal object is deceivably simple: $T$ is internal if $T \in \ \! ^*A$ for some standard $A$. However, most of the time this is not sufficient to get a feeling of what objects are internal and what objects are not. For this topic, it's best to refer to some introductory books to nonstandard analysis.