I just started learning about epsilon-delta limit proofs, and I want to know how to prove using the epsilon-delta definition of a limit that $\lim_{x\to a}(\sin x) = \sin a$
I tried and failed, so I looked it up online and found the trick is to use the identity $\sin x < x$. I cannot find any proofs that do not use this identity.
I had never seen this identity before, so I searched for its proof and found this proof that uses the mean value theorem. Again, I haven't yet learnt the mean value theorem, but according to the website, it requires a continuous (and differentiable) function $f$.
But the concept of continuity is defined using the epsilon-delta limit definition! In fact, the fact that $\sin(x)$ is continuous is exactly the statement that I'm trying to prove above: $\lim_{x\to a}(\sin x) = \sin a$
This is clearly circular reasoning. My question is how does one escape it? Either there must be a way to prove $\lim_{x\to a}(\sin x) = \sin a$ without the identity $\sin x < x$, or we need to prove $\sin x < x$ without the fact that sin is continuous. Or I suppose there could be a 3rd option? I can't find any answers on how to do it, which I find most strange...
A very analytic approach is to start from integrals and define $\log, \exp, \sin$ and show that these are smooth, and therefore continuous, on their domains.
First we define the natural logarithm by $$ \ln x := \int_1^x \frac{dt}{t} $$ It's easy to show the logarithm laws using this definition and integration rules, and that $\ln$ is differentiable.
Then we define the exponential function as its inverse, $$ \exp := \ln^{-1} $$ By the inverse function theorem, $\exp$ is differentiable and thus continuous.
The Maclaurin/Laurent series of $\exp$ has infinite radius of convergence so $\exp$ can be extended from $\mathbb{R}$ to a smooth function on all of $\mathbb{C}.$ We can therefore define the function $\sin$ by $$ \sin x := \frac{\exp(ix)-\exp(-ix)}{2i} $$ which will also be smooth and thus continuous.