In Artin's Algebra, Proposition 15.6.8 is: Let $f$ be an irreducible polynomial in $F[x]$.
$f$ has no multiple root in any field extension of $F$ unless $f'$ is the zero polynomial.
Then, it is written that in a field $F$ of characteristic $5$, since derivative of $f(x)=x^{15}+ax^{10}+bx^5+c$ is zero, its roots will be multiple roots in any extension.
How does this follow from the statement given?
The conditional statement $q$ unless $\neg p$ is equivalent to if $p$ then $q$. So,
$f$ has no multiple root in any field extension of $F$ unless $f'$ is the zero polynomial.
is equivalent to
If $f'$ is not the zero polynomial, then $f$ has a multiple root in any extension of $F$.
and by contraposition, this is equivalent to
If $f$ has no multiple root in any field extension of $F$, then $f'$ is the zero polynomial.
So, how does the derivative equivalent to zero imply $f$ has a multiple root in any extension?
You're right that the conclusion doesn't follow from the statement you quoted first. But it is reasonably easy to prove from first principles:
Let $f(x)=x^{15}+ax^{10}+bx^5+c$ in some field of characteristic $5$, and suppose $\xi$ is a root of $f$. Now consider the function $$ g(y)=f(y+\xi)=(y+\xi)^{15}+a(y+\xi)^{10}+b(y+\xi)^5+c$$ This is a polynomial in $y$. If we use the binomial theorem to expand $(y+\xi)^{5n}$, the only terms whose binomial coefficient don't vanish modulo $5$ are those where the power of $y$ is a multiple of $5$. So $g$ must actually have the form
$$ g(y)=y^{15}+a'y^{10}+b'y^5+c'$$ and since $g(0)=0$ (because $\xi$ was a root of $f$) we have that $c'=0$. Thus $$ g(y) = p(y)y^5 $$ for some polynomial $p$. But then $f(x)=g(x-\xi) = p(x-\xi)\cdot(x-\xi)^5$ which by definition means that $\xi$ is an at least fivefold root of $f$.