If $R$ is a commutative ring with unity, we know that filtered colimits are exact. We also know that in an algebraic category, filtered colimits commute with finite limits. Are the following statements true? 1) Co-filtered limits are exact in $R-Mod$. 2) Co-filtered limits commute with finite colimits in algebraic categories.
2026-03-31 08:19:19.1774945159
Co-filtered limits in algebraic categories.
490 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in HOMOLOGICAL-ALGEBRA
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- $A$ - dga over field, then $H^i(A) = 0, i > 1$ implies $HH_i(A) = 0, i < -1$
- Tensor product $M\otimes_B Hom_B(M,B)$ equals $End_B(M)$, $M$ finitely generated over $B$ and projective
- Group cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}(V)$
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- Existence of adjugant with making given natural transformation be the counit
- Noetherian property is redundant?
- What is the monomorphism that forms the homology group?
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Related Questions in ABELIAN-CATEGORIES
- What is the monomorphism that forms the homology group?
- Injective objects in a category
- Category of complexes
- Snake lemma and regular epi mono factorization
- A question to Weibel’s IHA lemma 2.6.14 Part 2
- Why do the finitely generated subsheaves of a sheaf form a directed system?
- Supremum of a family of subobjects in an abelian category
- Opposite effective classes in a Grothendieck group
- Question about $\mbox{Ext}$ groups in abelian categories
- How to show that $\mathsf{Ab}$(Category of Abelian Groups) is an abelian category?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No, claim 1) is false, and thus so is claim 2). Consider the inverse system of exact sequences of abelian groups whose rows are the sequences $\mathbf{Z}\to \mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}/p^n$. The columns are respectively the inverse systems (1) whose objects are all $\mathbf{Z}$ and whose morphisms are all $p$ (2) whose objects are all $\mathbf{Z}$ and whose morphisms are all $1$ and (3) whose objects are $\mathbf{Z}/p^n$ and whose morphisms are all $1$. The limits are respectively $0$,$\mathbb{Z}$, and the $p$-adics $\mathbb{Z}$, so the limiting sequence is very far from exact on the right.
The failure of claim (1) is measured by the (first) derived functor of limit, $\mathrm{lim}^1$. For countable inverse systems the higher derived functors of limit vanish, though for general shapes there can be arbitrarily many nontrivial derived functors.
An intuitive reason why your claims should be false is that categories in which filtered colimits commute with finite limits are very often locally finitely presentable; but a locally presentable category with locally presentable opposite must be a poset. This is a theorem of, I think, Freyd, which can be found in Adamek and Rosicky's book on locally presentable categories.