I would like to ask for tips how to manage with proof of this proposition. How to show that $v$ can be uniquely extended to $v'$ ? Should I assume that $v$ can be also extended to another valuation? Also I don't know how to get equation.
2026-03-25 06:06:17.1774418777
Complete valuation, norm of finite extension. Proof of Propositon.
199 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FIELD-THEORY
- Square classes of a real closed field
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Proving addition is associative in $\mathbb{R}$
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible for an infinite field that does not contain a subfield isomorphic to $\Bbb Q$?
- Proving that the fraction field of a $k[x,y]/(f)$ is isomorphic to $k(t)$
- Finding a generator of GF(16)*
- Operator notation for arbitrary fields
- Studying the $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ when $p(x)$ is any degree.
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
Related Questions in EXTENSION-FIELD
- Field $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ with $\alpha=\sqrt[3]7+2i$
- $\overline{A}\simeq\overline{k}^n $ implies $A\simeq K_1\times\cdots\times K_r$
- Extension of field, $\Bbb{R}(i \pi) = \Bbb{C} $
- A field extension of degree $\leq 2$
- Field not separable
- Intersections of two primitive field extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$
- Fields generated by elements
- Find the degree of splitting field of a separable polynomial over finite field
- Eigenvalues of an element in a field extension
- When a product of two primitive elements is also primitive?
Related Questions in VALUATION-THEORY
- Does every valuation ring arise out of a valuation?
- Calculating the residue field of $\mathbb{F}_q(t)$ with respect to the valuation $-\deg$
- Different discrete valuation rings inside the same fraction field
- Extensions of maximally complete fields
- State Price Density Integration - Related to Ito's lemma
- Valuation on the field of rational functions
- Is every algebraically closed subfield of $\mathbb C[[X]]$ contained in $\mathbb C$?
- Working out an inequality in the proof of Ostrowski's Theorem
- The image of a valuation is dense in $\mathbb{R}$
- Kernel of the map $D^2+aD+b : k[[X]] \to k[[X]]$ , where $D :k[[X]] \to k[[X]]$ is the usual derivative map
Related Questions in LOCAL-FIELD
- What is meant by a category of unramified extension of $K$ (a local field)?
- Given a local field is the maximal unramifield extension always finite?
- $(K^*)$ in $K^*$
- How do we know that reducing $E/K$ commutes with the addition law for $K$ local field
- How is $\operatorname{Gal}(K^{nr}/K)$ isomorphic to $\operatorname{Gal}(\bar{k}/k)$?
- Extending a valuation of a local field
- On the Galois group of the maximal $p$-abelian $p$-ramified extension of a number field
- Finite extension of $K$,a finite extension of $\mathbb{Q}_p$, that is Galois?
- Why is $E[2]$ of $E: y^2 = x^3 - p$ over $\mathbb{Q}_p$ ramified?
- Are there any $\mathbb{Q}_p$ which contains the third root of unity?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

This is a consequence of Hensel’s Lemma. Not the version that talks about roots of a polynomial, but the version that says that if the polynomial factors into two relatively prime factors over the residue field, then it factors over the original ring, and you can guarantee that one of the factors upstairs has the same degree as the factor downstairs.
I think that if you prove the following Lemma, you should be able to get the whole thing:
Lemma. Let $k$ be a field complete under the (additive) valuation $v$, and let $f(X)=X^n+c_{n-1}X^{n-1}+\cdots+c_1X+c_0$ be $k$-irreducible. Then:
(1) If $v(c_0)\ge0$, then for all $i$, $v(c_i\ge0$;
(2) If $v(c_0)>0$, then for all $i$, $v(c_i)>0$;
(3) If $v(c_0)<0$, then $v(c_0)<\min_{0<i}v(c_i)$.
An important consequence is:
Proposition. Let $k$ be a field complete under the additive valuation $v$, and let $K$ be an algebraic extension of $k$, with a valuation $V$ extending $v$. Then $\mathcal O=\{z\in K:V(z)\ge0\}$ is the integral closure in $K$ of $\mathfrak o=\{z\in k:v(z\ge0\}$.
In other words, for $z\in K$, you get $V(z)\ge0\Longleftrightarrow z\text{ is integral over }\mathfrak o$.
I think that now it should be easy to show that if $V$ and $V'$ are extensions of $v$ from $k$ to $K$, then $V=V'$. That does it for uniqueness.
For existence, use the formula given. Of course the formula guarantees multiplicativity immediately; what you need besides is the additivity: $V(a+b)\ge\min\bigl(V(a),V(b)\bigr)$. You get this by showing that if $V(z)\ge0$, then $V(1+z)\ge0$ as well. Use the fact that the Norm $N^{k(z)}_k(z)$ is, up to sign, the constant coefficient of the minimal $k$-polynomial for $z$.