Galois Group of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}):\mathbb{Q}$ is cumbersome to computing. Is easy to find the all four possible candidates but is cumberstone to show that they are automorphisms:
For multiplication is too long showing that
$f((a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})(a'+b'\sqrt{2}+c'\sqrt{3}+d'\sqrt{6}))=f(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})f(a'+b'\sqrt{2}+c'\sqrt{3}+d'\sqrt{6})$
For some non trivial candidate since the left hand side expands in $16$ terms. What about $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3},\sqrt{5}):\mathbb{Q}$? there are $7$ non trivial candidates and multiplication expands in $64$ terms!
How to do it in a tricker form?
Edit(Let me be more precise in my question):
I know that if $f\in\Gamma(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}):\mathbb{Q})$, then $f(\sqrt{2})=\pm\sqrt{2}$, $f(\sqrt{3})=\pm\sqrt{3}$ so there are $4$ candidates for $\mathbb{Q}$-Automorphisms. Candidates are given by:
$f_1(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})=a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6}$
$f_2(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})=a-b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}-d\sqrt{6}$
$f_3(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})=a+b\sqrt{2}-c\sqrt{3}-d\sqrt{6}$
$f_4(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})=a-b\sqrt{2}-c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6}$
But I need to check that they are $\mathbb{Q}$-Automorphisms in $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$. All candidates $f_i$ fixes $\mathbb{Q}$ and is obvious that all preserves sums, $f_1$ obviously preserves product also since is the identity, but is cumberstone to show that $f_i(xy)=f_i(x)_if(y)$ to conclude $f_i\in\Gamma(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}):\mathbb{Q})$.
To reiterate a point in @ErikVesterlund's comment, as well as Andrea Mori's and Ayman Hourieh's answers: there is no need to "directly" verify that the indicated maps are $\mathbb Q$ homomorphisms, because we have already proven this indirectly, by invoking the main theorem of Galois theory, in effect. That is, we show that the degree of the extension really is what it appears to be. Then, observe that any Galois automorphism must permute roots of irreducibles over the base, so _at_most_ $\sqrt{2}\rightarrow \pm \sqrt{2}$, and similarly for any other square roots. Thus, in your first example, there are _at_most_ these four. But/and Galois theory says there _at_least_ four, so these four must be "it". Similarly in the second example, after showing that the field extension really is of degree $2^3$, again we see that there are _at_most_ the $8$ automorphisms that flip the signs of the $3$ square roots, and Galois theory say there are _at_least_ $8$, so those must be "it".
No explicit verification that multiplication is preserved is needed!