Converse of Fundamental Theorem of Line Integral

124 Views Asked by At

enter image description here

Why is this converse not called the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integral? It resembles the first part of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which comes the first.

Also, Wikipedia presents this theorem and then proves it assuming $F$ is continuous and the domain is open and path-connected. Does path independence imply the latter assumptions? If not, are there any counterexamples to the theorem?