In the three dimensions, the cross product $A \times B$ is said to be a $(1,2)$ tensor. But the definition I know about tensors is that $(1,2)$ tensor is a multilinear map $T : V^* \times V^2 \to \mathbb{R}$ where $V^*$ is the dual space of $V$. So how does the cross product fit in this definition? Could anyone explain?
2026-03-24 23:51:08.1774396268
Cross product as a tensor
617 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in TENSOR-PRODUCTS
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Inclusions in tensor products
- How to prove that $f\otimes g: V\otimes W\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism
- What does a direct sum of tensor products look like?
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
- Tensor modules of tensor algebras
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- Algebraic Tensor product of Hilbert spaces
- Why $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to+\infty}x_n\otimes y_n=x\otimes y\;?$
- Proposition 3.7 in Atiyah-Macdonald (Tensor product of fractions is fraction of tensor product)
Related Questions in TENSORS
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- tensor differential equation
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- What is this notation?
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Generalization of chain rule to tensors
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- $n$-dimensional quadratic equation $(Ax)x + Bx + c = 0$
- What's the best syntax for defining a matrix/tensor via its indices?
Related Questions in CROSS-PRODUCT
- Proof that $\left(\vec a \times \vec b \right) \times \vec a = 0$ using index notation.
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- Calculus III Vector distance problem.
- linear algebra - Parallel vectors
- Geometry of the plane in 3D and cross product
- derivative of cross product of vectors with respect to vector
- Finding perpendicular and parallel vectors
- Why is the unit vector negative when solving $\sin(a-b) = \sin(a)\cos(b) - \cos(a)\sin(b)$?
- A question about cross product
- Linear Algebra: Cross Product w/ Matrices
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
So recall that $V^*$ is the dual space of $V$, i.e. the space of linear maps from $V$ to the ground field $\mathbb{R}$.
So what do we mean by a $(1,2)$-tensor? Well, a tensor of type $(k,l)$ is defined as an element of the vector space $\otimes_k V \bigotimes \otimes_l V^*$. Now, I claim that we can identify tensors of type $(1,l)$ with $l$-multilinear maps taking values in $V$. You are perhaps already familiar with the case $l=1$: There is an identification $\mbox{Lin}(V,V) \cong V \otimes V^*$. The identification map we want to consider for general $l$ is rather similar, and I can elaborate if you want.
Clearly then, the cross product is a bilinear map from $\mathbb{R}^3 \times \mathbb{R}^3$ to $\mathbb{R}^3$ and hence falls in the category above, for $l=2$. I hope this helps!
You can also view a tensor of type $(1,2)$ as a map in the way you described it, but this may be a little confusing. Can you explain how you came to this point of view?