In group theory, it helped me a lot to use symmetry groups of geometrical objects like a triangle to understand the more abstract concepts. Are there rings with a similar low level of abstractness?
I know $\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Z}[X]$, $K[X]$ and $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{d}], d \in \mathbb{Z}$ which are all quite abstract. Maybe not $\mathbb{Z}$ but it is too "nice" and doesn't illustrate the more interesting properties of rings or the lack thereof very well.
If you want an easy to understand new concrete example of associative rules, distributive rule, and multiplication inverses and identity rules that contribute to defining a ring, consider the so-called "tropical semiring", i.e. min-addition semiring over the reals. For two real numbers, "addition" of $x,y$ is defined as $\min(x,y)$, and "multiplication" of two reals is defined as $x + y$. With this definition of addition and multiplication, you can check that associativity holds for addition and multiplication, and that the distributive property holds, and that $0$ is the multiplicative identity, and multiplicative inverses exist (the inverse of $x$ is $-x$). However there is no additive identity and no additive inverses, because min is an "irreversible" operation. Hence why it's called a "semi-ring" instead of a ring. But it illustrates most of the ring properties and is very easy to understand and verify.