Are the statements
- "Expectation exists"
- "Expectation is finite"
equivalent? If not, could someone please provide a counterexample.
In case it's relevant, I don't know measure theory, but am confortable with probability theory & statistics at the undergraduate level.
They are not equivalent, but this is somewhat a matter of opinion. There are three classes of random variables:
An example of variable in class (2) is the St. Petersburg random variable, which is equal to $2^k$ with probability $2^{-k}$ for $k\ge 1$. Another example is, letting $X_i$ be an iid sequence of random variables equal to $\pm1$ with equal probabilities, the random variable $\tau$ equal to the smallest positive integer for which $X_1+X_2+\dots+X_\tau=1$.
For variables in class (3), there is the Cauchy distribution with pdf proportional to $\frac1{1+x^2}$.
The question is whether or not you consider variables in category (2) to have an expectation which "exists" or not. I say the expectation exists, so that an expectation can exist but not be finite. However, I think some people disagree, just like there is disagreement as to whether $$ \lim_{x\to0}\frac1{x^2} $$ is either non-existent, or existent and equal to $+\infty$. I think most professional mathematicians have no qualms saying the limit exists, but it is often taught in entry level calculus courses that such limits do not exist.