In the code below (works in SageMathCell) I took a uniformly distributed random variable with support $(0,1)$ and did some operations. Then I generated $10,000$ points randomly sampled from the distribution (see below). I fixed the parameter at $s=.25$ in this plot.
def random_point():
return ((exp(.25/ln(random()))), exp(.25/ln(random())))
l = [random_point() for k in [1 .. 10000]]
t= point2d(l,size=1.5,color='blue')
P=show(t, aspect_ratio='1')
I'm looking to formally define (obtain an expression) for a bivariate distribution, or surface, (unnormalized) from this plot. So, the more dense the points are in the plot should correspond to a higher point on the surface and less density should correspond to a lower point on the surface.
Furthermore as the parameter $s$ changes, where $s>0,$ the surface should change as well. I can visualize the surface and how it changes with the varying parameter.
How can I obtain a distribution function, say $f(x,y;s)$ that corresponds to the random points plotted?

Let us define $\phi(x):=\exp\left(\tfrac{s}{\ln(x)}\right), \ \text{with} \ 0<s<1$.
One can establish that this function $[0,1] \to [0,1]$, whatever the value of parameter $s$
is decreasing.
is its own inverse,
as illustrated here :
Fig. 1 : Function $\phi$ for values of $s$ in [0.05, 1] by steps of 0.05. Case s=0.25 is featured in red.
The coordinates of the points can be described as :
$$(X,Y)=(\phi(U_1),\ \phi(U_2))$$
where $U_1,U_2 \sim I.U.D([0,1])$, (independent uniformly distributed on $[0,1]$).
The joint CDF of $(X,Y)$ is defined as :
$$F_{X,Y}(x,y)=P(X<x,Y<y)=P(\phi(U_1)<x,\phi(U_2)<y)$$
Due to the fact that $\phi^{-1}=\phi$ and that this function is decreasing :
$$F_{X,Y}(x,y)=P(U_1>\phi(x),U_2>\phi(y))=(1-\phi(x))(1-\phi(y))$$
Its pdf (probability density function) is obtained by taking the mixed second partial derivative :
$$f_{X,Y}(x,y)=\frac{\partial^2 F(x,y)}{\partial x \partial y}=\phi'(x)\phi'(y)$$
You will get a graphical representation of surface $z=f(x,y)$ by using the following SAGE code :
with this result :
Fig. 2 : The theoretical pdf corresponding to your simulation. Its equation is given in the 3rd line of the program. Please note that we have truncated the domain of definition of $f$ because it isn't bounded in the vicinity of $(1,1)$.
Remark: One should note that function $\phi$ is conjugated to a function $\psi$ which is its own inverse :
$\phi=exp \circ \psi \circ exp^{-1}$ where $\psi(x)=\frac{s}{x}$
Therefore $\phi$ is its own conjugate also.