How $|\mathbb R|$ is not weakly compact

141 Views Asked by At

$\mathbb R$, of cardinality $|\mathbb R|=2^{\aleph_0}$ is not weakly compact.

So there is a function $f$ from $[{\mathbb R}]^2$ (the subsets of $\mathbb R$ of size 2) to $\{0,1\}$ such that there is no $X\subset \mathbb R$ of cardinality $|\mathbb R|$, such that $f$ is constant on $[X]^2$.

I know, by the infinite Ramsey's theorem that there is no such function if I use $\mathbb N$ instead of $\mathbb R$, but how do you build such a function $f$ for $\mathbb R$ ?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

12
On BEST ANSWER

Note that being weakly compact is not synonymous with "having the tree property", but rather it is synonymous with "having the tree property and being inaccessible". Note that $2^{\aleph_0}$ is never a strong limit cardinal, so the latter must fail and $2^{\aleph_0}$ cannot be a weakly compact cardinal.

The continuum can be almost weakly compact, though, meaning it may still have the tree property. This, of course, requires the consistency strength of a weakly compact cardinal to begin with. Of course this means that $2^{\aleph_0}>\aleph_1$, since $\sf ZFC$ proves that $\aleph_1$ doesn't have the tree property.

You can find references in both these papers:

  1. William Mitchell, Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property, Annals of Mathematical Logic, Volume 5, Issue 1, Dec. 1972, pp. 21-46.

  2. Uri Abraham, Aronszajn trees on $\aleph_2$ and $\aleph_3$, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Volume 24, Issue 3, Sep. 1983, pp 213-230.