Question: How to solve the following integral? $$I = \int_0^\infty \dfrac{x^{N_a + N_b - 1}}{(p \Omega_1 + \Omega_2 x)^{N_a + 1}} \ln (1 + Qx) \, _2F_1\left( N_b + 1, N_b; N_b +1; \dfrac{-\Omega_3}{\Omega_4}x\right)dx, \tag{1}$$ where $N_a, N_b \in \mathbb Z_+$ and $\Omega_1, \Omega_2, \Omega_3, \Omega_4, p, Q \in \mathbb R_+$. I am looking for a closed-form solution for the above integral. A solution in terms of any special function will also be good enough.
Any leads appreciated.
My attempt: Representing $\log(1 + Qx)$ in terms of Meijer's $G$ function, we have \begin{align} I = {} & \, \Omega_2^{-(N_a + 1)}\int_0^{\infty}x^{N_d + N_b - 1}\left( x + \dfrac{p\Omega_1}{\Omega_2}\right)^{-(N_a + 1)}G_{2, 2}^{1, 2}\left( Qx \left\vert \begin{smallmatrix} 1, & 1\\ 1, & 0\end{smallmatrix}\right.\right) \\ & \hspace{6cm}\times\, _2F_1\left( N_b + 1, N_b; N_b +1; \dfrac{-\Omega_3}{\Omega_4} x\right) \, dx \tag{2} \end{align} A solution to (2) exists in [1, eqn. 2.2], resulting into infinite series summation.
Can anyone suggest any alternate solution that doesn't contain infinite series sum?
Here is an alternate way to solve. \begin{align} & \int_{0}^{\infty} \dfrac{x^{N_a + N_b - 1}}{(p \Omega_1 + \Omega_2 x)^{N_a + 1}} \ln(1 + Qx) \, _2F_1\left( N_b + 1, N_b,; N_b +1 , \dfrac{-\Omega_3}{\Omega_4}x\right)dx \\ = & (p\Omega_1)^{-(N_a + 1)} \int_{0}^{\infty} x^{N_a + N_b - 1} \left( 1 + \dfrac{\Omega_2}{p\Omega_1} x\right)^{-(N_a + 1)} \ln(1 + Qx) \, _2F_1\left( N_b + 1, N_b,; N_b +1 , \dfrac{-\Omega_3}{\Omega_4}x\right)dx \\ = & \dfrac{1}{(p\Omega_1)^{(N_a + 1)} \Gamma(N_a + 1)\Gamma(N_b)} \int_{0}^{\infty} x^{N_a + N_b - 1} G_{1, 1}^{1, 1} \left( \left.\dfrac{\Omega_2}{p\Omega_1} x\right\vert \begin{smallmatrix} -N_a \\ 0\end{smallmatrix}\right) G_{2, 2}^{1, 2} \left( Qx \left\vert \begin{smallmatrix} 1, & 1 \\ 1, & 0\end{smallmatrix} \right.\right) G_{2, 2}^{1, 2} \left( \left.\dfrac{\Omega_3}{\Omega_4}x \right\vert \begin{smallmatrix} -N_b, & 1 - N_b \\ 0, & -N_b\end{smallmatrix}\right)dx, \tag{1} \end{align} where the second term inside the integral is represented as a Meijer's G function using [1, Section IV-C], the log function is represented as a Meijer's G function using [2, below Fig. 1] and the Gauss hypergeometric function is represented as a Meijer's G function using [3, eqn. (17)]. The closed-form solution to (1) is now straightforward to represent using 4, in terms of extended generalized bivariate Meijer’s G function (EGBMGF).
Note: Looking for some expert comments/opinions.
[1]. I.S. Ansari, et.al., "Impact of Pointing Errors on the Performance of Mixed RF/FSO Dual-Hop transmission Systems".
[2]. P.S. Bithas, "Digital Communications over Generalized-K Fading Channels"
[3]. V.S. Adamchik, et.al. "The algorithm for calculating integrals of Hypergeometric type functions and its realization in REDUCE system"
[4]. http://functions.wolfram.com/07.34.21.0081.01