The partitions are "ordered", meaning that for 5, from (2,3), (3,2) and (5) all are valid.
So for the first few numbers one gets:
2 3 4 5 6 7
(2) (3) (2,2) (2,3) (2,2,2) (2,2,3)
(4) (3,2) (2,4) (2,3,2)
(5) (3,3) (2,5)
(4,2) (3,2,2)
(6) (3,4)
(4,3)
(5,2)
(7)
In other words, the total number of ways to partition $n$ is $\text{Fibonacci}(n-2)$, but why? I get why there have to be at least as many possibilities for $n$ as there are for $n-1$, but what is the conceptual argument for also $n-2$?
(These are actually compositions, not partitions.) You get one composition of $n$ by adding $1$ to the last element of each composition of $n-1$; you also get one by appending a last part $2$ to each composition of $n-2$. The resulting sets of compositions of $n$ don’t overlap: each one in the first set has a last element that is at least $3$, while those in the second set all have last element $2$.
To put it a little differently, you can decompose the compositions of $n$ into parts greater than $1$ into those that end in $2$ and those that end in a number greater than $2$. The ones that end in $2$ are obtained by appending $2$ to any acceptable composition of $n-2$. The onees that end in a number greater than $2$ are obtained by adding $1$ to the last element of some acceptable composition of $n-1$. Every acceptable composition of $n$ arises in exactly one of these two ways.