In abstract algebra, a module is indecomposable if it is non-zero and can not be written as a direct sum of two non-zero submodules. In other words an $R$-module $M$ is indecomposable, if $M=A\oplus B$ which $A,B$ are submodules of $M$, we conclude that $A=0$ or $B=0$. Let $(R,\frak m)$ denote a commutative Gorenstein local ring and $M$ a finitely generated indecomposable $R$-module. Suppose that $E(R/\frak m)$ denotes the injective hull of the field $(R/\frak m)$. I guess $M\otimes_RE(R/\frak m)$ is an indecomposable $R$-module. But I cant prove it. If my guess is not true, may we take a little condition on M (such as M is maximal Cohen-Macaulay), to $M\otimes_RE(R/\frak m)$ be indecomposable?
2026-03-25 09:14:45.1774430085
Is $M\otimes E(R/m)$ an indecomposable module?
118 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in TENSOR-PRODUCTS
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Inclusions in tensor products
- How to prove that $f\otimes g: V\otimes W\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism
- What does a direct sum of tensor products look like?
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
- Tensor modules of tensor algebras
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- Algebraic Tensor product of Hilbert spaces
- Why $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to+\infty}x_n\otimes y_n=x\otimes y\;?$
- Proposition 3.7 in Atiyah-Macdonald (Tensor product of fractions is fraction of tensor product)
Related Questions in COHEN-MACAULAY
- Looking for easy example of 2-dimensional Noetherian domain which is not Cohen-Macaulay
- regular sequences: proving the geometric interpretation
- Completion and endomorphism ring of injective envelope
- Integral extension of a local ring is semilocal
- For a Cohen-Macaulay local ring grade and height are same
- Cohen-Macaulay ring without non-trivial idempotent is homomorphic image of Noetherian domain?
- Noetherian Catenary ring and Cohen-Macaulay ring
- Background of Commutative Algebra for Cohen-Macaulay orders and bibliography
- Is a quotient of ring of polynomials Cohen-Macaulay?
- Determining maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules over an invariant ring
Related Questions in GORENSTEIN
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- Characterisation of Gorenstein Curve
- Example of Gorenstein ring that has infinite Krull dimension?
- If $R$ is generically Gorenstein, then $\operatorname{Ann}(\operatorname{Ann}(I))=I$ for every ideal $I$ with non-zero annihilator?
- On possible closure operation induced by derived functors
- Note or book on Examples of regular, Gorenstein, Cohen Macaulay, ... rings
- What is a hypersurface ring and why is it Gorenstein?
- Tor functor for the quotient of a Gorenstein local ring
- Gorenstein, complete intersection
- Localization of Gorenstein ring
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is true if $M$ is reflexive, which is the case if $M$ is maximal Cohen-Macaulay, as you assume $R$ to be Gorenstein. Indeed, without loss of generality, we may pass to the completion to suppose $R$ is complete. By Matlis duality, $M \otimes_R E(R/\mathfrak{m})$ is indecomposable if and only if $\operatorname{Hom}_R(M \otimes_R E(R/\mathfrak{m}),E(R/\mathfrak{m})) \cong \operatorname{Hom}_R(M,R)$ is so. Noting that $\operatorname{Hom}_R(M,R)$ satisfies Serre's condition $(S_2)$ and is thus unmixed, any proper decomposition of $\operatorname{Hom}_R(M,R)$ provides a proper decomposition of $\operatorname{Hom}_R(\operatorname{Hom}_R(M,R),R)) \cong M$ as each component has maximal dimension, establishing the claim.
This need not be true if $M$ is not reflexive. E.g., take $R=k[\![x,y]\!]$ and let $M$ be any indecomposable $R$-module of rank $>1$. Then $\operatorname{Hom}_R(M,R)$ is a second syzygy and is thus free over $R$ (as $R$ has global dimension $2$). Since the rank of $M$ is greater than $1$, it follows that $\operatorname{Hom}_R(M,R) \cong R^{\oplus \operatorname{rank}(M)}$ is not indecomposable. If one wants a concrete $M$, take for instance $M=\operatorname{im} \begin{pmatrix} y & x & 0 \\ 0 & y & x \\ \end{pmatrix}$