Is the surface integral of a vector field through the six surfaces of a cube zero when the vector field is defined in the whole region. If I integrate over all the surfaces for any vector field. The flux through opposite surfaces cancel out. So is this true for a cube?
2026-03-25 21:48:55.1774475335
Is the surface integral of a vector field through the six surfaces of a cube zero?
179 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in VECTOR-ANALYSIS
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- Gradient and Hessian of quadratic form
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Estimation of connected components
- Finding a unit vector that gives the maximum directional derivative of a vector field
- Gradient of transpose of a vector.
- Solve line integral
- Directional derivative: what is the relation between definition by limit and definition as dot product?
- Chain rule with intermediate vector function
- For which $g$ is $f(x)= g(||x||) \frac{x}{||x||}$ divergence free.
Related Questions in VECTOR-FIELDS
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- In a directional slope field, how can a straight line be a solution to a differential equation?
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- If $\nabla X=h \cdot \text{Id}_{TM}$ for a vector field $X$ and $h \in C^{\infty}(M)$, is $h$ constant?
- Equivalent definition of vector field over $S^2$
- Study of a " flow "
- Extension of a gradient field
- how to sketch the field lines of $F(x,y)=(\sin y,-\sin x)$?
- Is a vector field a mathematical field?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is not necessarily true for a cube (or for any closed surface).
If we imagine the vector field as measuring a velocity field of water in motion, then flux measures how much water is passing through the surface.
Now, if all your water is moving left to right, then you're right that the flux through the left face and the right face of a cube cancels out (and the flux through the remaining 4 walls is 0 because no water passes through them.)
But fluid flow can be vastly more complicated! In particular, if you have a source of water inside the solid, you can easily arrange for the net flux to be non-zero. (This is essentially amd's suggestion in the comments)
Now, water in real life is often (roughly) incompressable. If you assume this, as well as that there are no sources or sinks for water to emanate from or disappear into, then you have mathematically assumed the divergence of your vector field is zero. Then the divergence theorem tells you the net flux through the surface is 0, in this case. I think this is why your intuition was leading you to guess the net flux was zero.