Given complete discrete valuation fields $K$ and $L$, finite extension $K\subset L$, corresponding d.v.r. $\mathcal O_K$ and $\mathcal O_L$ with maximal ideals $\mathfrak{m}_K$ and $\mathfrak{m}_L$ is it true that $\mathcal O_K/ \mathfrak{m}_K \subset \mathcal O_L/\mathfrak{m}_L$ is a finite field extension. I can see that one is subset of another, but why should this extension be finite?
Thank you.
You can show the following statement from which the result follows
Do this as follows:
Suppose $\bar\alpha_1,\dots,\bar\alpha_n$ are linearly independent over $\mathcal O_K/\mathfrak m_K$, and suppose you have an equation $c_1\alpha_1+\cdots+c_n\alpha_n=0$ in $L$ with $c_i\in K$.
Scale by the $c_i$ with largest absolute value so that, without loss of generality, you can assume some $c_i$ has absolute value $1$ and the rest $\le1$.
Consider the equation modulo $\mathfrak m_L$ and derive a contradiction.