I've adapted this problem from a TedEd riddle that I solved yesterday. It asks, what is the minimum number of rooms required such that every room except one room is connected to exactly three other rooms, except for one "special" room that is only connected to one other room. You can think of this like you're designing an art gallery to meet these conditions, and your "special" room contains a very rare painting which has to sit behind a vault door of which you only have one. I won't state the answer in this thread so as to not spoil the puzzle.
Anyway, I thought of an interesting extension of this puzzle. Suppose your building company is rather cheap, and can only build walls in integer multiples of one meter and walls can only intersect at right angles, i.e, they can only build on "gridlines". Note that non rectangular rooms are allowed, as long as any vertex has an interior angle of $90$ or $270$ degrees. Furthermore, a door takes up an entire one meter segment, and for ease of navigation, 2 rooms may not be touching without a door between them. My question is, what is the minimum area, in multiples of $1\text{m}^2$ boxes, of such a gallery design? How might I work this out?



Here's a proof of a lower bound of $10 \text{ m}^2$ if we want to replicate the $6$-room solution. Here's the graph:
Let's modify the gallery as follows. First, forget about the room adjacent only to one other room for now. Now four rooms have $3$ adjacencies, and one room only has $2$. Second, take the room with $2$ adjacencies, and break down one of the walls separating it from an adjacent room. Now we have only $4$ rooms left, and each one is adjacent to all the others.
As a graph, this graph has a unique planar embedding: three vertices in a triangle, and one vertex in the middle of the triangle. If we try to turn this planar embedding into an art gallery, then the room corresponding to the middle vertex has to be entirely surrounded by the other three rooms.
Even if the middle room is only $1\text{ m}^2$, it takes $8\text{ m}^2$ to completely surround it; making the middle room bigger would only hurt. That gives us $9\text{ m}^2$ of area already. We must have had the same area before we tore down a wall; if we put that wall back, the gallery still has to have $9\text{ m}^2$ of area.
Finally, this is all ignoring the room with $1$ adjacency, which adds another $1\text{ m}^2$ of area, for a total of $10\text{ m}^2$.
More generally, the argument above shows that if we want to go below $10\text{ m}^2$, then the graph of the art gallery with the vault room deleted must be outerplanar: there can't be a room entirely surrounded by other rooms.
However, an outerplanar graph can't have the degree sequence $3,3,3,\dots, 3,3,2$ (with any number of $3$'s, and only one $2$). The argument is a bit technical, but essentially, if all the vertices lie on a cycle, and we take any chord of the cycle, we are forced to put a degree-$2$ vertices somewhere on each side of the chord.
In other words, it's impossible to have an art gallery with the property in the question, if every non-vault room has to border the outside wall of the building.