Given a list of positive integers $ x_1, x_2, x_3, \ldots, x_n $, we can find positive integer coefficients $ c_1, c_2, c_3, \ldots, c_n $ such that
$$ c_1x_1 \lt c_2x_2 \lt c_3x_3 \lt \ldots \lt c_nx_n $$
(For eg., for $ 5, 4, 12, 1, 3 $, the coefficients $ 1, 2, 1, 13, 5 $ produce the increasing list $ 5, 8, 12, 13, 15 $.)
There is a smallest (i.e. least in value) set* of such coefficients for a given list. What is an upper bound, in terms of values in the given list, on the largest coefficient in such a minimum-value set of coefficients?
* By smallest, what I have in mind is the result of this iterative process:
$ c_1 = 1 $.
$ c_2 $ is the smallest positive integer such that $ c_2 x_2 \gt x_1 $.
$ c_3 $ is the smallest positive integer such that $ c_3 x_3 \gt c_2 x_2 $.
$ c_4 $ is the smallest positive integer such that $ c_4 x_4 \gt c_3 x_3 $.
And so on.
I think this might be the same as saying the set of coefficients with the least sum, but in case it is not, the above is the actual expected answer.
With your "algorithm", you have, for all $k$, by choosing the least possible $c_{k+1}$ ($\lfloor x\rfloor$ being the greatest integer lower than $x$): $$c_{k+1}=\left\lfloor\frac{c_kx_k}{x_{k+1}}\right\rfloor+1\le \frac{c_kx_k}{x_{k+1}}+1$$ So for example : $$c_2\le \frac{c_1x_1}{x_2}+1 = \frac{x_1+x_2}{x_2}$$ $$c_3\le \frac{c_2x_2}{x_3}+1=\frac{x_1+x_2+x_3}{x_3}$$ And so on. More generally : $$(\forall k)\ c_k\le \frac{x_1+x_2+\dots+x_k}{x_k}$$ So one simple majoration for your coefficients is : $$(\forall k)\ c_k\le \sum_{i=1}^n x_i$$ Is that the kind of majoration you are looking for ?