In Urysohn's Metrization Theorem, at some point we define a function $F : X \rightarrow H$ from the space X into Hilbert space $H$. Whereupon we need to show that $F$ is an embedding. To show this, it apparently suffices to show that $F$ is
- one-to-one
- continuous
- an open mapping.
I don't see how the last two differ?
Continuity is proven with open sets, so is an open mapping?
A map is continuous if preimage of open sets are open sets and it is open if direct image of open set are open sets.
More precisely, $f:X\to Y$ is continuous if $f^{-1}(V)\subset X$ is open for any open set $V\subset Y$.
It is open if $f(U)\subset Y$ is open for any open set $U\subset X$.