$P(X+Y>t\mid aX+bY>u)\geq P(X+Y>t)$?

3k Views Asked by At

Let $X,Y$ be independent continuous random variables with support on some neighbourhood of infinity. Let $a, b\geq 0$, and $t,u\in\mathbb{R}$ be constants. Then it holds that $$P(X+Y>t\mid aX+bY>u)\geq P(X+Y>t). $$

Do you know how to prove this? it sounds very intuitive and easy, but all that I tried failed.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

8
On BEST ANSWER

For simplicity we assume $a>0$ rather than only $a\geq0$.

By Bayes' formula, we may equivalently show that \begin{align*} \mathbb{P}(aX + bY > u \, | \, X + Y > t) \geq \mathbb{P}(aX + bY > u). \end{align*} Using the tower property in both the numerator and the denominator, \begin{align*} \mathbb{P}(aX + bY > u \, | \, X + Y > t) &= \dfrac{\mathbb{P}(aX + bY > u, X + Y > t)}{\mathbb{P}(X+Y>t)} \\ &= \dfrac{\mathbb{E}[\mathbb{P}(aX + bY > u, X + Y > t \, | \, Y)]}{\mathbb{E}[\mathbb{P}(X + Y > t \, | \, Y)]}. \end{align*} Similarly, \begin{align*} \mathbb{P}(aX + bY > u) = \mathbb{E}[\mathbb{P}(aX + bY > u \, | \, Y)]. \end{align*} Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent and $a>0$, \begin{align*} \mathbb{P}(aX + bY > u, X + Y > t \, | \, Y) &= S_X(Y_1 \vee Y_2), \\ \mathbb{P}(X + Y > t \, | \, Y) &= S_X(Y_2), \\ \mathbb{P}(aX + bY > u \, | \, Y) &= S_X(Y_1), \end{align*} where $S_X(x) := 1 - \mathbb{P}(X \leq x)$ and $x_1 \vee x_2 = \max\{x_1,x_2\}$, while \begin{align*} Y_1 = \dfrac{u - bY}{a}, \hspace{5mm} Y_2 = t-Y. \end{align*} Note that $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ are functions of $Y$, and thus $S_X(Y_1 \vee Y_2)$, $S_X(Y_2)$, and $S_X(Y_1)$ are also random variables (more precisely, transformations of $Y$).

Collecting terms, we want to show that \begin{align*} \dfrac{\mathbb{E}[S_X(Y_1 \vee Y_2)]}{\mathbb{E}[S_X(Y_1)]\mathbb{E}[S_X(Y_2)]} \geq 1. \end{align*} Now obviously, $S_X(Y_1 \vee Y_2) \geq S_X(Y_1)S_X(Y_2)$. So it suffices to show that \begin{align*} \text{Cov}[S_X(Y_1),S_X(Y_2)] = \mathbb{E}[S_X(Y_1)S_X(Y_2)] - \mathbb{E}[S_X(Y_1)]\mathbb{E}[S_X(Y_2)] \geq 0. \end{align*} Note that $S_X(Y_1)$ is a non-decreasing function of $Y$ since $Y_1$ is a non-increasing as a function of $Y$ (recall $b\geq0$) and $S_X$ is a survival function and thus non-increasing. Similarly, $S_X(Y_2)$ is a non-decreasing function of $Y$. Consequently, see e.g. this question, we must have $\text{Cov}[S_X(Y_1),S_X(Y_2)] \geq 0$ as desired.

2
On

Is this a valid counterexample?

Counterexample