Second order logic implies categoricity in peano arithmetic. But why are the models isomorphic to the standard model of aritmhetic and not to another non standard model, for example?
2025-01-12 23:33:06.1736724786
PA2 (Peano Arithmetic in 2º order logic and categoricty)
178 Views Asked by Raúl Aparicio Bustillo https://math.techqa.club/user/raul-aparicio-bustillo/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- how does complicated truth tables work?
- Implication in mathematics - How can A imply B when A is False?
- Different Quantifiers, same variable
- Elimination of quantifiers in the strucure of polynomials and in the structure of exponentials
- What are the prerequisites for "Systems of Logic Based on Ordinals (1938)" by Turing?
- Help with Prover9 for weak propositional systems
- State machine scenario: finding invariant
- “You cannot... unless...” and “You can... only if...”
- Quantifiers and If then statements
- Show that $\forall x\varphi\vDash\varphi[t/x]$ may not hold if $t$ is bound for $x$ in $\varphi$.
Related Questions in PEANO-AXIOMS
- Prove if $x<y$ then $x+z<y+z$
- For each $x,y,z∈\mathbb N$, if $x<y$ then $x+z<y+z$
- For each $x,y∈\mathbb N$, if $x≤y$ and $y≤x$, then $x=y$
- PA2 (Peano Arithmetic in 2º order logic and categoricty)
- Is $ConPA \rightarrow \neg \Box \neg ConPA$ true in the standard model of arithmetic?
- End extension models of $I\Delta_0$
- Why is there a need for ordinal analysis?
- A subtle point regarding the axiom of induction
- Stuck on GEB chapter 9 - is b a MU number? is b a TNT number?
- How do we know $\mathbb{N}$ is a model of Peano Arithmetic?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
The point is that there is a single second-order sentence which completely characterizes (up to isomorphism) the structure $(\mathbb{N}, 0, 1, <, +, \times)$. Specifically, the standard model is characterized by the property that every element has only finitely many predecessors - and we can write this in second-order logic as $$\forall n\forall F([\forall m(m<n\implies F(m)<n) \wedge \forall m_1, m_2(m_1\not=m_2\implies F(m_1)\not=F(m_2))]$$ $$\implies \forall m<n\exists k<n(F(k)=m));$$ in English, this is just saying "for every $n$, every injective function from $\{m: m<n\}$ to $\{m: m<n\}$ is surjective." This sentence, when conjoined with the finitely many non-induction axioms of Peano arithmetic, characterizes the standard model up to isomorphism.