- What is the probability, that a random number $N$ with $k$ digits has no prime factor with at most $l$ digits ?
I came across the formula $\frac{e^{-\gamma}}{log(p)}$ , giving the approximate probability that a very large number (much larger than $p$) has no prime factor below $p$, if $p$ itself is "large". But neither do I know how the author came to this formula, nor do I know how accurate this formula is.
- How good is the approximation, if the probability that a $100$ digit-number has no prime factor below $10^{30}$ has to be calculated ?
A $100$-digit number starting with a $1$ has much higher probability that it is a product of two distinct $50$-digit primes than a $100$-digit number starting with a $9$.
- Is there a formula accurate enough to approve this fact ?
The problem, I am struggling with, is :
If $N$ is a random number in the range $[42^{61}-10^{12},42^{61}+10^{12}]$, which has no prime factor below $10^{30}$, is composite and no prime power, what is the probability that $N$ is the product of two distinct $50$-didit primes ?
This is a problem investigated by De Bruijn in 1951. Here is the reference:
N. G. de Bruijn, The asymptotic behaviour of a function occurring in the theory of primes, J. Indian Math. Soc. (N.S.) 15 (1951), 25–32. MR 0043838 (13,326f)
Note: This information was found by doing a Google search for "small prime factors". The information here was found in this paper:
D Hensley The number of positive integers ≦ x and free of prime divisors > y J. Number Theory, 21 (1985), pp. 286–298 which is at
http://ac.els-cdn.com/0022314X85900575/1-s2.0-0022314X85900575-main.pdf?_tid=efecc0ec-1227-11e5-a313-00000aab0f26&acdnat=1434240024_1e2f77b3b9cd73d1f7fae0e9801ed017
That paper was found as a reference in this paper, which was found by the search: "On the number of positive integers ≦ x and free of prime factors > y" by Adolf Hildebrand at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022314X86900132
The definition:
$\Psi(x, y)$ is the number of positive integers $\le x$ with all prime factors $\le y$.
Let $u = \frac{\log x}{\log y}$.
De Bruijn proved that, for small $u$, $\Psi(x, y) \approx x \rho(u) $ where $\rho(u) = 1$ for $0 \le \rho \le 1$ and $u \rho'(u) =-\rho(u-1) $ for $u > 1$. He showed that this is true for $u \le (\log x)^{3/8-\epsilon} $. According to this paper, this has been shown for $u \le (\log x)^{1-\epsilon} $.
De Bruijn also showed this lower bound valid for all $x$ and $y$: $\Psi(x, y) \ge \binom{\pi(y)+[u]}{[u]} $.
The rest is up to you.
Another hint: Look up "smooth number".
Here are all the references in Hensley's paper: