I've posted the solution for this problem and I'm trying to understand this.
In the end of the solution provided it says to continue this process. So, do we hold $a_n$ to be $\frac{1}{n^2}$ and $b_n$ to be $\frac{1}{900^2}$ for the next $900^2$ terms? And then hold $b_n$ to be $\frac{1}{n^2}$ and $a_n$ to be $\frac{1}{810000 ^2}$ for the next $810000 ^2$ terms? (because $900^2$ is $810000$)
And why do we have to add one to the sum of partial sums?
The idea behind the more challenging version is to construct $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ such that $\sum a_n,\sum b_n$ both diverge, but $\sum \min\{a_n,b_n\}$ converges. The way the author of this solution has chosen to proceed is by making $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ such that for each $n$, we have $\min\{a_n,b_n\} = 1/n^2$, and yet we add enough small constant terms to each sequence so that the partial sums eventually grow by $1$ if we wait long enough. This growth by $1$ repeated over and over again ensures that the series $\sum a_n,\sum b_n$ both diverge since their partial sums each grow without bound by merely waiting long enough.
To find how many terms we add again, think about the pattern \begin{align*} (1+1) - 1 &= 1^2 \\ (5 + 1) - 2 &= 2^2 \\ (30 + 1) - 6 &= 5^2 \\ (930 + 1) - 31 &= 30^2 \\ (865830 + 1) - 931 &= 930^2 \\ (x + 1) - 865831 &= 865830^2 \\ \dotsb \end{align*}