Pseudocompactness does not imply compactness

Question

It is well known that compactness implies pseudocompactness; this follows from the Heine–Borel theorem. I know that the converse does not hold, but what is a counterexample?

(A pseudocompact space is a topological space $S = \langle X,{\mathfrak I}\rangle$ such that every continuous function $f:S\to\Bbb R$ has bounded range.)

Answer 1

A favorite example (and counterexample) to many things is the first uncountable ordinal $\omega_1$ in its order topology: $[0,\omega_1)$. It is pseudo-compact but not compact.

Answer 2

I couldn't think of an obvious counterexample, so I looked in Wikipedia and it suggested the particular point topology on an infinite set.

$\def\p{{\bf x}}$In the particular point topology, we have a distinguished point, $\p\in X$, and the topology is that a set is open if and only if it is either empty, or includes $\p$.

Let $S=\langle X,{\mathfrak I}\rangle$ be an infinite particular-point space with distinguished point $\p$. It is clear that $S$ is not compact: the open cover consisting of $\{p, \p\}$ for each $p\in X$ other than $\p$ is an infinite open cover of $S$ with no proper, and therefore no finite subcover.

$\def\R{{\Bbb R}}$However, the space is pseudocompact. Let $f:S\to\R$ be a continuous function. Then $f^{-1}[\Bbb R\setminus \{f(\bf x)\}]$ is an open set not containing $\bf x$, so it must be empty, hence $f$ is constant.

Answer 3

Note that sequential compactness also implies pseudocompactness, so any sequentially compact space which is not compact will work as well (the particular point topology is not sequentially compact, either, so it's different kind).

For example, the Corson space $\Sigma([0,1]^\kappa)$ of sequences of length $\kappa$ with countable support is not compact for uncountable $\kappa$ (which is easy to see), but is sequentially compact (which is a bit harder to see). It is also completely regular Hausdorff, which makes it sort of a "stronger" example than particular point topology. $\Sigma(2^\kappa)$ should work fine for this, too.

Answer 4

$\pi$-Base, a searchable version of Steen and Seebach's Counterexamples in Topology, gives the following examples of pseudocompact spaces that are not compact. You can view the search result to learn more about any of these spaces.

$[0,\Omega) \times I^I$

An Altered Long Line

Countable Complement Topology

Countable Particular Point Topology

Deleted Tychonoff Plank

Divisor Topology

Double Pointed Countable Complement Topology

Gustin’s Sequence Space

Hewitt's Condensed Corkscrew

Interlocking Interval Topology

Irrational Slope Topology

Minimal Hausdorff Topology

Nested Interval Topology

Novak Space

Open Uncountable Ordinal Space $[0, \Omega)$

Prime Integer Topology

Relatively Prime Integer Topology

Right Order Topology on $\mathbb{R}$

Roy's Lattice Space

Strong Ultrafilter Topology

The Long Line

Tychonoff Corkscrew

Uncountable Particular Point Topology

Answer 5

An example that does not depend on countable compactness is Mrówka’s space $\Psi$. Subsets of $\omega$ are said to be almost disjoint if their intersection is finite. Let $\mathscr{A}$ be a maximal almost disjoint family of subsets of $\omega$, and let $\Psi=\omega\cup\mathscr{A}$. Points of $\omega$ are isolated. Basic open nbhds of $A\in\mathscr{A}$ are sets of the form $\{A\}\cup(A\setminus F)$, where $F$ is any finite subset of $A$. $\Psi$ is not even countably compact, since $\mathscr{A}$ is an infinite (indeed uncountable) closed, discrete set in $\Psi$. (In fact it’s not hard to ensure that $|\mathscr{A}|=2^\omega$.)

To see that $\Psi$ is pseudocompact, suppose that $f:\Psi\to\Bbb R$ is continuous. Since $\omega$ is dense in $\Psi$, it suffices to show that $f[\omega]$ is bounded. If not, we can choose $S=\{n_k:k\in\omega\}\subseteq\omega$ such that $f(n_{k+1})\ge f(n_k)+1$ for each $k\in\omega$. The maximality of $\mathscr{A}$ ensures that there is an $A\in\mathscr{A}$ such that $A\cap S$ is infinite. Let $A_0=\{k\in\omega:n_k\in A\cap S\}$. Then $\langle f(n_k):k\in A_0\rangle\to f(A)$, which contradicts the choice of $S$.

$\Psi$ clearly is $T_2$ and has a clopen base, so it’s Tikhonov. It’s not normal, however, since in $T_4$ spaces pseudocompactness is equivalent to countable compactness.

Added: This example is somewhat akin to what Steen & Seebach call the strong ultrafilter topology.