I'm reading Probability, Random Processes & Ergodic properties by Gray.
$(\Omega, \mathcal F, P, T)$ is a random dynamical system where $T$ is a $\mathcal F$-measurable map (i.e. $T^{-1}(F)$ is measurable for every $F \in \mathcal F$).
An invariant event is defined as any event $F$ such that $T^{-1}(F)=F$.
Now my question is: does the above imply also $T(F)=F$ for any invariant event $F$ ?
Note that there is not an explicit constraint on $T$ to be onto (surjective).
Thank you.
In general no: for a measurable selfmap $T: \Omega \to \Omega$, it is not necessarily true that the image $T(F)$ of a measurable subset $F$ is measurable. (See e.g. the discussion at measurable functions. Why defined like this? for more on this).
On the other hand, if $T$ is a bimeasurable selfmap, so that there is a selfmap $T^{-1}$ that is also measurable and $T\circ T^{-1} = \text{id}_{\Omega}$, then the property becomes true. Often even when $T$ is not bimeasurable one can consider image sets as measurable by way of e.g. the Lusin-Souslin Theorem (see e.g. Measurable invariance of domain) or passing to the natural invertible extension (see e.g. Proving a.e surjectivity of suggested factor map in Natural extension of Standard Borel dynamical system or Exr.2.1.7 and 2.1.8 on p.20 of Einsiedler & Ward's Ergodic Theory).