Let $(M,\omega)$ be a Kähler manifold and $h$ be its Hermitian form, then in local sense we can write $$\omega=\partial\bar\partial\log h,$$ and also if $f$ be the Kähler potential then we can write $$\omega=\partial\bar\partial\log f.$$ So, my question is can say $f$ is equal to $h$ up to additional constant? if we have $f$ then how can we find $h$
2026-03-25 14:27:23.1774448843
Relation between Kähler potential and Hermitian metric
454 Views Asked by user61135 https://math.techqa.club/user/user61135/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in COMPLEX-GEOMETRY
- Numerable basis of holomporphic functions on a Torus
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Hausdorff Distance Between Projective Varieties
- What can the disk conformally cover?
- Some questions on the tangent bundle of manifolds
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Reason for Graphing Complex Numbers
- Why is the quintic in $\mathbb{CP}^4$ simply connected?
- Kaehler Potential Convexity
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
Related Questions in SYMPLECTIC-GEOMETRY
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- Proof that 1-Form on a Symplectic Manifold is Closed?
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Dimension of the Marsden-Weinstein reduction of a coadjoint orbit in the dual of the Lie algebra of the gauge group (Atiyah-Bott context)
- Symplectic form on the n-torus
- Computing the flow on the cotangent bundle
- Action-angle variables in non-compact level sets
- About the tangent space of a coadjoint orbit
Related Questions in KAHLER-MANIFOLDS
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Kaehler Potential Convexity
- Equality of $C^\infty$-functions on a complex manifold
- A compact Kähler manifold X with $H^{1,1}(X; \mathbb Z)=0$ cannot be embedded in a projective space?
- Picard group of a Torus
- à la Shafarevich conjecture for the moduli space of Calabi-Yau manifolds
- Difference of cohomologous Kähler forms
- What are the challenges and the importance to build an explicit K3 metric?
- Relative Hitchin-Kobayashi correspondence and relative Hermitian Yang-Mills connections
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I agree with the comments that you must be working with a line bundle in order to make any sense out of that expression. So let's suppose that it the case (and hence $\omega$ is the curvature of the associated Chern connection). Also, I think that you have to assume, for the following argument to hold, that $M$ is compact and connected. I know how to prove this if $f$ is a real function with $\omega=i\partial \bar{\partial}f$, which you can always find locally (maybe there is a similar argument for the case in hand).
So suppose that $\phi$ is a real local function on $M$ such that $\partial\bar{\partial}\phi=0$. Hence $\partial\phi$ is a closed and holomorphic (1,0)-form (use $d\partial=\bar{\partial}\partial=-\partial\bar{\partial}$), and then the $\partial\bar{\partial}$-lemma implies that $\partial \phi=\bar{\partial}\psi$ for some $0$-form. But this forms have different type, and hence must be both equal zero. Hence $\partial \phi=0$ and also $\bar{\partial}\phi=0$ (since $\phi$ is real), and therefore you get $d\phi = 0$, i.e $\phi$ is constant ($M$ connected).
In your case, apply to $\phi=logf-logh$ (assuming $f,h$ real).