If it is known that $\mathbb{Q}$ is a PID, and that $x^2-2$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$ (and thus maximal in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$), then how can we determine from this that $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]$ is a field? I think there is a theorem that I do not know or have forgotten about in order to arrive at this conclusion. Would definitely appreciate some insight.
Show that $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]$ is a field
427 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 3 best solutions below
On
You might have learnt how to rationalize the denominator in expressions of the form $\displaystyle \frac{a+b\sqrt n}{c+d\sqrt n}$. This procedure, when the numerator is taken as $1\ ( a=1, b=0)$ proves that $\mathbf{Q}[\sqrt n]$ is a field.
In case you are not aware of this procedure it simply means muliply the numerator and the denominator by the 'conjugate' of the denominator, ie by $c-d\sqrt n$.
On
I believe you are thinking about results of simple algebraic extensions. $F[x]/(p(x))$ will be a field containing a root to $p(x)$ as long as $p(x)$ is irreducible, thus maximal. $R/M$ is a field when $M$ is maximal. So you are thinking about $\mathbb{Q}[X]/(X^2-2)$
http://sierra.nmsu.edu/morandi/OldWebPages/Math331Spring2003/Chapter5.pdf
This seems a decent writeup with plenty of examples to refresh you.
It is like the construction of $\mathbb{C} \cong \mathbb{R}[X]/(X^2+1)$
Here is the theorem :
By this theorem you can directly arrive at your desired conclusion.
EDIT 1:
EDIT 2: (As per suggestion by Don Antonio in the comments)
Proof - Let $a$ be algebraic over $F$ and $p(x) \in F[x]$ be the minimal irreducible polynomial having $a$ as a root. Let $f(x) \in F[x]$ be such that $f(a) \neq 0$. Then $p(x) \not| f(x)$ and $p(x),f(x)$ are relatively prime. Hence there exist polynomials $g(x)$ and $h(x) \in F[x]$ such that $g(x)p(x)+h(x)f(x)=1 \Rightarrow g(a)(0)+h(a)f(a)=1 \Rightarrow h(a)f(a)=1$. That is $f(a)$ is invertible in $F[a]$. This means $F[a]$ is field. Since any field containing $F$ and $a$ also contains polynomials in $a$ hence $F[a] \subseteq F(a)$. But $F(a)$ is by definition the smallest field containing $F$ and $a$. Hence $F(a) \subseteq F[a]$. It follows $F(a)=F[a]$.
Conversely, assume $F(a)=F[a]$. Suppose $a$ is transcendental over $F$. Since $F(a)$ is smallest field containing $F$ and $a$, it also contains $\frac 1a$. But $\frac 1a \notin F[a]$. Hence we have a contradiction. and $a$ must be algebraic over $F$.