Consider the relation $≈$ on $ℕ$:
If $x = {p_1}^{x_1} \times {p_2}^{x_2} ... \times {p_k}^{x_k}$ and $y = {p_1}^{y_1} {p_2}^{y_2} ... {p_k}^ {y_k}$ , where $p_i$ are distinct primes and $x_i$ and $y_i$ are nonnegative integers, then $x ≈ y$ iff $x_1 + x_2 + \ldots + x_k = y_1 + y_2 +\ldots + y_k$.
Show $≈$ is an equivalence relation
I know I need to show reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.
For reflexivity I have $x ≈ x \iff x_1 + x_2 + \ldots + x_k = x_1 + x_2 + \ldots + x_k$, which is clearly true.
And for symmetry I have $x ≈ y \implies y ≈ x$,
so
\begin{align*} &x_1 + x_2 + \ldots + x_k = y_1 + y_2 +\ldots + y_k \\ \implies &y_1 + y_2 +\ldots + y_k = x_1 + x_2 + \ldots + x_k \end{align*}
which is also clearly true.
This seems too easy and I feel like I'm doing this wrong.
$ \newcommand{\p}[1]{\prod_i p_i^{#1_i}} \newcommand{\s}[1]{\sum_i #1_i} $ This is more or less correct; the main remaining issue, as noted in the comments, is to use that the fundamental theorem of arithmetic ensures the uniqueness of the prime factorization. (Your relation is not only relative to the sums of the exponents, but a priori also relative to the primes $p_i$ you use.) Then each property follows easily:
Reflexivity: Since $x = \prod_i p_i^{x_i}$ (and this is the only representation of $x$ for the primes $p_i$, up to having $x_i = 0$ for some $i$'s) and $\sum_i x_i = \sum_i x_i$ trivially, $x \approx x$.
Symmetry: Assume $x \approx y$. Since $x = \prod_i p_i^{x_i}$ and $y = \p y$, then $\s x = \s y$. Equality is a symmetric relation, so $\s y = \s x$, and the prime decomposition is the only one, so $y \approx x$.
Transitivity: Assume $x \approx y$ and $y \approx z$. Then we may write $x,y,z$ uniquely by $x = \p x$, $y = \p y$, and $z = \p z$. By assumption, $\s x = \s y$ and $\s y = \s z$. By the transitivity of equality, $\s x = \s z$, and, alongside the uniqueness of the prime decomposition, this ensures $x \approx z$.
Mostly just posting this to get this out of the unanswered queue. Posting as Community Wiki in particular since I have nothing further to add.