In 1981, Koide found the empirical relation,
$$\frac{m_e+m_\mu+m_\tau}{\big(\sqrt{m_e}+\sqrt{m_\mu}+\sqrt{m_\tau}\big)^2} = 0.666659\dots\approx \frac{2}{3}\tag1$$
where $m$ are the masses of the three leptons: electron, muon, and tau, approximately, $0.5, 105, 1776$. Later, about 2011, an identical relation was found,
$$\frac{m_c+m_b+m_t}{\big(\sqrt{m_c}+\sqrt{m_b}+\sqrt{m_t}\big)^2} = 0.666649\dots\approx \frac{2}{3}\tag2$$
where $m$ are the masses of the three heaviest quarks: charm, bottom, and top, approx $1290, 4370, 174100$. Some physicists dismiss these two as just numerology.
I was wondering how easy it was to find such relations so, using a small set of constants, found,
$$\frac{\pi+e+K}{\big(\sqrt{\pi}+\sqrt{e}+\sqrt{K}\big)^2} \approx 0.33376\dots\frac{1}{3}\tag3$$
where $K$ is the Khinchin constant.
Q: Let's make things difficult. Using three distinct constants $c_i$ that are a) well-known, b) transcendental (proven or not), and, c) like the Koide formula, the $c_i$ are not powers or multiples of each other, nor close to each other,$$\frac{c_1+c_2+c_3}{\sqrt{c_1}+\sqrt{c_2}+\sqrt{c_3}}\approx R$$ can you find a combination of $c_i$ that is nearer to some rational $R$ than $(1)$ or $(2)$?
To take a random example, if $G$ is Catalan's constant and $\gamma$ the Euler-Mascheroni constant, then $$ \dfrac{3 G^2+2 G+\pi^2-4 \pi}{\ln(\pi^2 \gamma G)} \approx 0.9999999413$$