Suppose $(M,\omega)$ is a symplectic manifold and $X$ a smooth vector field defined on $M$ such that its corresponding flow $\{g_s\}_{s\in\mathbb{R}}$ is defined for all $s$ in sone some $U_s\subset M$. Is it true that if the Lie derivative $\mathcal{L}_X \omega=0$, then the flow is symplectic; i.e. $g_s^*\omega=\omega$?
2026-03-27 19:31:36.1774639896
Sufficient condition for a flow to be symplectic
117 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in VECTOR-FIELDS
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- In a directional slope field, how can a straight line be a solution to a differential equation?
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- If $\nabla X=h \cdot \text{Id}_{TM}$ for a vector field $X$ and $h \in C^{\infty}(M)$, is $h$ constant?
- Equivalent definition of vector field over $S^2$
- Study of a " flow "
- Extension of a gradient field
- how to sketch the field lines of $F(x,y)=(\sin y,-\sin x)$?
- Is a vector field a mathematical field?
Related Questions in SYMPLECTIC-GEOMETRY
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- Proof that 1-Form on a Symplectic Manifold is Closed?
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Dimension of the Marsden-Weinstein reduction of a coadjoint orbit in the dual of the Lie algebra of the gauge group (Atiyah-Bott context)
- Symplectic form on the n-torus
- Computing the flow on the cotangent bundle
- Action-angle variables in non-compact level sets
- About the tangent space of a coadjoint orbit
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For simplicity, I'll just assume that the flow of $X$ is defined everywhere; i.e $g:\Bbb{R} \times M \to M$. I think a stronger statement is true as well. If $T$ is any tensor field on $M$, then we have \begin{align} \mathcal{L}_XT = 0 \quad \iff \text{for all $s\in \Bbb{R}$, } g_s^*T = T \end{align} The proof of this follows from the "flow definition" of Lie-derivatives, that $\mathcal{L}_XT := \dfrac{d}{ds}\bigg|_{s=0}g_s^*T$ (everything is of course interpreted pointwise).
From this definition, the "if" part ($\impliedby$) of the statement is clear. For the "only if" ($\implies$) part, note that since flows have the group property that $g_{s_1 + s_2} = g_{s_1}\circ g_{s_2}$, it follows that for every $\lambda\in \Bbb{R}$, \begin{align} \dfrac{d}{ds}\bigg|_{s=\lambda} g_s^*T &= g_{\lambda}^*(\mathcal{L}_XT) \end{align} (this is just a 1-2 line calculation). So, based on the assumption $\mathcal{L}_XT = 0$, the above identity shows that for every $\lambda\in \Bbb{R}$, $\dfrac{d}{ds}\bigg|_{s=\lambda} g_s^*T = 0$. This means $\lambda \mapsto g_{\lambda}^*T$ is a constant function (notice that we're implicitly using the fact $\Bbb{R}$ is connected here). By evaluating at $\lambda = 0$, we see the "constant" (in this case a constant tensor field with respect to $\lambda$) is $T$.
From here, you can of course specialize to the case where $T = \omega$ is the symplectic form. But nothing in the proof is simplified by assuming this from the beginning (side note: applying to the case where $T=g$ is the metric tensor from Riemannian geometry shows that the flow of a vector field consists of isometries if and only if $\mathcal{L}_Xg = 0$; i.e Lie derivative of the metric vanishes).