I have linear map with matrix $A$. How can I prove, that the Kronecker product ($ A \otimes A$) satisfies the condition, that $ A \otimes A (u \otimes v) = A(u) \otimes A(v)$? To simplify this problem let be $A : \mathbb{R}^3 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^3$.
2026-03-25 12:53:47.1774443227
tensor product of linear maps and Kronecker product
253 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in TENSOR-PRODUCTS
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Inclusions in tensor products
- How to prove that $f\otimes g: V\otimes W\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism
- What does a direct sum of tensor products look like?
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
- Tensor modules of tensor algebras
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- Algebraic Tensor product of Hilbert spaces
- Why $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to+\infty}x_n\otimes y_n=x\otimes y\;?$
- Proposition 3.7 in Atiyah-Macdonald (Tensor product of fractions is fraction of tensor product)
Related Questions in TENSORS
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- tensor differential equation
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- What is this notation?
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Generalization of chain rule to tensors
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- $n$-dimensional quadratic equation $(Ax)x + Bx + c = 0$
- What's the best syntax for defining a matrix/tensor via its indices?
Related Questions in KRONECKER-PRODUCT
- Kronecker Product of Vectors with "all-ones" Vector
- Simplification for Kronecker product between block matrix and identity matrix (Khatri-Rao product)
- Bounding the determinant of principal sub-matrices of the Kroneker product
- Derivative of the trace of a Kronecker product
- Derivative involving trace and Kronecker product
- central self-products of quaternion and (8)-dihedral groups $\mathbb{Q_8} \otimes \mathbb{Q_8}^{\text{op}} \cong D_8 \otimes D_8$?
- Writing this matrix expression in terms of vec operator
- Derivative of $(Ax) \otimes y$ with respect to $x$
- Computing the Symmetric Kronecker Product
- Computing the derivative of $Axx^TB^T$ with respect to $x$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A direct proof:
First, note that for the canonical basis vectors $e_i,e_j$, we have $$ (A \otimes A)(e_i \otimes e_j) = (A e_i) \otimes (Ae_j). $$ It follows that for $u = \sum u_i e_i$ and $v = \sum v_j e_j$, we have $$ (A \otimes A)(u \otimes v) = (A \otimes A)\left( \left(\sum_i u_i e_i \right) \otimes \left( \sum_j v_j e_j \right)\right) = (A \otimes A)\left( \sum_{i,j}u_i v_j e_i \otimes e_j\right) \\ = \sum_{i,j}u_i v_j [(A \otimes A)(e_i \otimes e_j)] = \sum_{i,j}u_i v_j (A e_i) \otimes (A e_j) \\ = \left( A \sum_i u_i e_i\right) \otimes \left( A \sum_j v_j e_j\right) = (Au) \otimes (Av). $$
What I find to be a more enlightening proof is as follows. First, note that there exists a linear map on $\Bbb R^n \otimes \Bbb R^n = \Bbb R^{n^2}$ such that $T(u \otimes v) = (Au) \otimes (Av)$ for all $u,v \in \Bbb R^n$ (this comes down to the definition of the tensor product). Now, we compute the matrix of $T$ relative to the basis $\mathcal B = \{e_i \otimes e_j : 1 \leq i,j \leq n\}$ where the pairs $(i,j)$ are taken in lexicographical order.
For instance, the first column of the matrix is $$ T(e_1 \otimes e_1) = (Ae_1) \otimes (Ae_1) = \sum_{i,j = 1}^n a_{i1}a_{j1} \ e_i \otimes e_j =\\ a_{11}(a_{11}e_1 \otimes e_1 + \cdots + a_{1n}e_1 \otimes e_n) + \cdots + a_{1n}(a_{11}e_n \otimes e_1 + \cdots + a_{1n}e_n \otimes e_n) = \\ \pmatrix{a_{11} Ae_1 \\ \vdots \\ a_{n1} Ae_1}_{\mathcal B} $$ and similarly, the second column is $$ T(e_1 \otimes e_2) = \pmatrix{a_{11} Ae_2 \\ \vdots \\ a_{n1} Ae_2}_{\mathcal B}. $$ In general, we have $$ T(e_i \otimes e_j) = \pmatrix{a_{1i} Ae_j \\ \vdots \\ a_{ni} Ae_j}_{\mathcal B}. $$ Putting all these columns together tells us that the matrix of $T$ relative to the basis $\mathcal B$ is the usual Kronecker product, i.e. $$ [T]_{\mathcal B} = A \otimes A = \pmatrix{a_{11} A & \cdots & a_{1n}A\\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ a_{n1}A & \cdots & a_{nn}A}. $$ The conclusion follows.