What geometric object $({{x,y,z,w}})$ is defined by the equation $xw-yz\le 0$ in $\mathbb R^4$? Using parametrics, can we describe this manifold? Is it possible to prove a diffeomorphism between this geometrical object and others?
2026-03-25 20:36:30.1774470990
the manifold of $ D=\{x,y,z,w \mid xw-yz \le 0\}$
240 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Related Questions in PARAMETRIC
- Suggest parametric equations for a given curve
- Parametric Circle equations and intersections
- Is it possible to construct the equation of a surface from its line element?
- Finding the equation of aline in implicit form
- Finding whether a parametric curve has a well defined tangent at the origin
- Parametric representation of a cylinder generated by a straight line
- Converting circle parametric equation
- Finding the major and minor axes lengths of an ellipse given parametric equations
- Draw (2, 3) torus knot on the unwrapped torus surface
- Question about parametric, implicit equation and vector equation
Related Questions in SYMPLECTIC-GEOMETRY
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- Proof that 1-Form on a Symplectic Manifold is Closed?
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Dimension of the Marsden-Weinstein reduction of a coadjoint orbit in the dual of the Lie algebra of the gauge group (Atiyah-Bott context)
- Symplectic form on the n-torus
- Computing the flow on the cotangent bundle
- Action-angle variables in non-compact level sets
- About the tangent space of a coadjoint orbit
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The set $D$ is not a manifold; in fact, it's not even a manifold with boundary. It has nonempty interior (the set of all points where $xw-yz<0$), so if it were going to be a manifold with boundary it would have to be $4$-dimensional, and thus its boundary would have to be a $3$-manifold, which it's not. The interior, however, is a $4$-manifold, because it's an open subset of $\mathbb R^4$.
Here's how to see that $\partial D$ is not a $3$-manifold. It's the set where $xw = yz$, and I claim this set is actually a cone on a torus. By that I mean it is homeomorphic to the quotient of the space $\mathbb S^1\times\mathbb S^1 \times [0,\infty)$, with the entire set $\mathbb S^1\times \mathbb S^1 \times \{0\}$ collapsed to a point. Consider the map $F\colon \mathbb S^1\times\mathbb S^1 \times [0,\infty) \to \mathbb R^4$, given by $$ (x,y,z,w) = F(\theta,\phi,r) = (r\cos\phi + r \cos\theta, r \sin\theta+ r\sin\phi, r\sin\theta- r\sin\phi, r\cos\phi- r\cos\theta), $$ where $\theta$ and $\phi$ are interpreted mod $2\pi$, so they represent points on a circle. A straightforward computation shows that $F$ maps into $\partial D$ and collapses the entire set $\mathbb S^1\times \mathbb S^1 \times \{0\}$ to the origin. A little more work shows that its image is all of $\partial D$ and it doesn't make any other identifications, so it descends to the quotient to show that $\partial D$ is homeomorphic to the cone I mentioned above.
This cone is not a $3$-manifold. The proof that it's not is a little technical, but here goes. Every point in a $3$-manifold has a neighborhood $U$ homeomorphic to a $3$-ball, and therefore when the given point $p$ is removed from $U$, the punctured set $U\smallsetminus \{p\}$ is simply connected. But if $U$ is any neighborhood of the origin in $\partial D$, when you remove the origin you get a set homeomorphic to an open subset of $\mathbb S^1\times \mathbb S^1 \times (0,\infty)$, and containing a torus of the form $\mathbb S^1\times \mathbb S^1 \times \{\varepsilon\}$ for some small $\varepsilon$. The set $U\smallsetminus \{0\}$ retracts onto this torus. Since a retract of a simply connected space is simply connected, while the torus is not, this shows that no punctured neighborhood of the origin in $\partial D$ is simply connected. Thus $\partial D$ is not a $3$-manifold, and $D$ is not a manifold with boundary.