I'm trying to understand a certain way of proving that
$$(1+x)^\alpha = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\binom{\alpha}{n}x^n$$
for $\alpha \in \mathbb{Q}$ and $|x|<1$.
Now, my notes tackle that proof by saying that for $\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{R}$:
$$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\binom{\alpha}{n}z^n \cdot \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\binom{\beta}{n}z^n = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}c_nz^n$$
with $$c_n =\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\binom{\alpha}{k}\binom{\beta}{n-k}=\binom{\alpha + \beta}{n} $$
and proceeding by proving that by induction.
Now, I can't even understand why proving the second notion would prove the initial theorem, so if anybody could explain or provide further material since I can't find anything about that particular way of proof, I'd be very thankful.
My guess is that what you wrote on the second paragraph is not meant to be a proof of the fact that $$(1+x)^\alpha=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\binom\alpha nx^n,\tag1$$but a proof of the fact that, if you define $(1+x)^\alpha$ by $(1)$, then$$(1+x)^\alpha(1+x)^\beta=(1+x)^{\alpha+\beta},\tag2$$since what it says there is precisely what is needed to prove that $(2)$ holds.