I have some questions understanding isomorphism. Wikipedia said that
isomorphism is bijective homeomorphism
I kown that $F$ is a homeomorphism if $F$ and $F^{-1}$ are continuous. So my question is: If $F$ and its inverse are continuous, can it not be bijective? Any example? I think if $F$ and its inverse are both continuous, they ought to be bijective, is that right?
When talking about functions between sets, there is no such thing as an "inverse" in the first place if the map is not bijective. Take a look at the relevant Wikipedia page.
Moreover, when you refer to
I think you're thinking of
which, by the way, happens to be true in some nice cases (groups, rings, etc.), but is absolutely not the definition of "isomorphism" in general, and in particular, is not true for topological spaces - there are functions $f:X\to Y$ that are bijective and continuous, but are not homeomorphisms.