I came across this question: Alice and Bob both try to climb a rope. Alice and Bob will get to the top with probability 1/3 and 1/4 respectively. given that exactly one person got to the top, what is the probability that the person is Alice.
The way the textbook solved it, they did $\frac13\times\frac34+\frac23\times\frac14$.
And I got that answer, but I was thinking, why can't we do inclusion-exclusion on the probability that exactly on person makes it to the top. ie, why cant we do $P[\text{Alice} ]+P[\text{Bob}]-P[\text{both}] = 1/3+1/4-1/12$ The calculation yields 2/3, not 5/12
So I'm confused -- when can we not use inclusion-exclusion?
Actually, both answers are wrong.
Breaking up into mutually exclusive cases,
P(only A reaches top) $= \frac 1 3\cdot \frac 3 4 = \frac 3 {12}$
P(only B reaches top) $= \frac 1 4\cdot \frac 2 3 = \frac 2{12}$
P(both reach top) $= \frac 1 3\cdot \frac 1 4 = \frac 1 {12}$
P(neither reach top) $= \frac 2 3 \cdot \frac 3 4 = \frac6 {12}$
The book has computed P(exactly one has reached top), you have computed P(at least one has reached top), whereas you are asked to find out P(A has reached top |exactly one has reached top)
You should be able to proceed now to get the correct answer
The correct answer is