This question arrise from a proof in paper: Unbounded derived categories and finitistic dimension conjecture - Jeremy Rickard, more spefically Theorem 4.3.
Let $A$ be a finite dimensional algebra over a field $K$ and $M$ a right $A$-module with projective dimension $d$. So let $P^{\bullet}$ be the minimal projective resolution of $M$ considered as a complex. Then $$\begin{align} \textrm{Tor}_d^A(M,A/radA)\neq 0\end{align}$$ that is, $P^{\bullet}[-d]\otimes_A (A/(radA))$ has nonzero cohomology in degree zero.($P^{\bullet}[-d]$ is the complex shifted $d$ times to right)
The question is: Why Tor is nonzero? That is, how justify this statement.
I'm grateful for any help.
For finite dimensional algebras, flat modules are projective, so the projective dimension of $M$ is the same as its weak dimension, which is $$\sup\{d\mid \text{Tor}^A_d(M,-)\neq0\}.$$ Since the class of left modules $X$ such that $\text{Tor}^A_d(M,X)=0$ is closed under coproducts and extensions, and every module is an iterated extension of coproducts of simple modules, this is $$\sup\{d\mid\text{Tor}^A_d(M,S)\neq0\text{ for some simple module }S\},$$ which yields the claim since every simple module is a direct summand of $A/\text{rad}A$.
Alternatively, writing $D$ for the vector space dual $D-=\text{Hom}_k(-,k)$, for any left module $X$, $$\text{Hom}_A(M,DX)\cong D(M\otimes_AX).$$ And so, taking derived functors, $$\text{Ext}^d_A(M,DX)\cong D\text{Tor}^A_d(M,X).$$
So $$\text{pd}(M)=\sup\{d\mid\text{Ext}^d_A(M,S)\neq0\text{ for some simple right module }S\}$$ is the same as $$\sup\{d\mid\text{Tor}^A_d(M,S)\neq0\text{ for some simple left module }S\}.$$