Where does the $\sqrt{N}$ come from in standard error of the mean formula?? When calculating z scores for multiple samples and want to describe the standard deviation of those sample means I know the formula is z = $\frac{(x - \mu)}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{N}}}$ where N is our sample size. Intuitively why does dividing by $\sqrt{N}$ make sense??
2026-03-29 15:35:57.1774798557
Where does the $\sqrt{N}$ come from in standard error of the mean formula??
255 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in STATISTICS
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- Statistics based on empirical distribution
- Given $U,V \sim R(0,1)$. Determine covariance between $X = UV$ and $V$
- Fisher information of sufficient statistic
- Solving Equation with Euler's Number
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- KL divergence between two multivariate Bernoulli distribution
- Given random variables $(T_1,T_2)$. Show that $T_1$ and $T_2$ are independent and exponentially distributed if..
- Probability of tossing marbles,covariance
Related Questions in STANDARD-DEVIATION
- Statistics question using normal distribution
- Is the usage of unbiased estimator appropriate?
- How do you calculate the probability of the difference between two normal distribution
- Does the null hypothesis always conform to a normal distribution?
- Calculating standard deviation without a data set.
- How to tell when a data series is a normal distribution
- Average and standard deviation equation system
- Linear interpolation of over time of standard deviation measurements
- Understanding a probability theory term "deviation"
- A baseball player hits the ball 35% of the time. In 10 opportunities, what is the probability of connecting more than 2 hits?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The intuitive part is that the average of $n$ values is less variable than any single observation from the population.
Suppose you are sampling from a population that has variance $\sigma^2.$ That is $V(X_i) = \sigma^2.$ However, $V(\bar X) = \sigma^2/n.$ So the variance of $\bar X$ does decrease as $n$ increases, which matches intuition.
Then it follows that the "standard error of the mean" is $$SD(\bar X) = \sqrt{V(\bar X)} = \sqrt{\sigma^2/n} = \sigma/\sqrt{n},$$ as in @LarryB's link.
It is not stretching intuition to understand that means are less variable than individual observations. Suppose you are trying to estimate the average weight of melons in a crate; it contains melons of very different sizes. On any one draw from the crate we might get a huge one or a tiny one. But if we draw a dozen melons, it seems likely we will get ones of various sizes and their mean weight will be closer to the mean weight for the crate.
But my intuition does not tell me that the exact relationship must be $V(\bar X) = \sigma^2/n$ for the variance or $SD = \sigma/\sqrt{n}$ for the standard error. For that, I need to do the math. Smaller, yes intuitive; divide exactly by $\sqrt{n},$ no.