I know that in a real-numbers-variant of Choquet game, the player aiming for non-empty intersection has a winning strategy. Is the same true for rational numbers?
2026-02-23 00:50:46.1771807846
Who has a winning strategy in Choquet game on rational numbers?
193 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GAME-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Perfect Information Game and Chance node
- Valid operations to the value of a matrix game
- Rook Game Problem Solving
- Proof of Axiom of Transparency in Aumman's model of knowledge
- Sion's MinMax theorem over matrices
- Can Zermelo's theorem be extended to a game which always has a winner?
- a risk lover agent behave as if risk natural.
- How to prove that a strategy profile is a Proper Equilibrium?
Related Questions in INFINITE-GAMES
- Gale-Stewart game
- Determinacy of complement of set
- Game theory applied to invoicing
- Game Theory Reccomendation, Mean Field Theory
- Proof that "$\uparrow$ is the unique solution of $\pmb{+}_G=G$"
- A question on repeated game theory
- A two player game on compact topological spaces
- Who has a winning strategy in Choquet game on rational numbers?
- Probability of winning a Craps game
- Explanation for Oxtoby's proof: a nonempty topological space $X$ is Baire iff player (I) has no winning strategy in the Choquet game
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No. A simple winning strategy for the empty-intersection player:
Enumerate the rationals. On the $n$th move, choose an interval that excludes the $n$th rational $r_n$.
One way to do so: If $r_n$ is not an element of $V_{n-1}$, we set $U_n=V_{n-1}$. If $r_n$ is an element of $V_{n-1}$, we set $U_n=V_{n-1}\cap (r_n,\infty)$. This isn't empty, because $U_n$ contains some interval $(r_n-\epsilon,r_n+\epsilon)$, and there are rational numbers in $(r_n,r_n+\epsilon)$.
Then, for each $n$, $r_n$ is not in the intersection $\bigcap_i U_i$. Every rational is some $r_n$, and the intersection is empty.