Let $m$ be some natural number and $q$ a prime such that $q\equiv 1\mod m$. Let $\alpha$ be a root of the $m$th cyclotomic polynomial and $\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]$ be the field extension of the integers by adding $\alpha$, and let $\langle q\rangle\subseteq \mathbb{Z}[\alpha]$ be the ideal generated by $q$. Then there will be some $\omega\in\mathbb{Z}_q$ such that the order of $\omega$ is $m$. Then a paper I was reading stated that the ideal $\langle q\rangle$ can be decomposed as: $$\langle q\rangle=\prod_{i\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}(\langle q\rangle+\langle\alpha-\omega^i\rangle)$$ Where each ideal $\langle q\rangle+\langle\alpha-\omega^i\rangle$ is coprime. They gave no proof of this decomposition, nor that these ideals are coprime. Any ideas on how the proof would go, or what I would look for to find a proof?
2026-03-26 11:04:12.1774523052
Why does a prime ideal in a cyclotomic number field factor in this way?
638 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-NUMBER-THEORY
- Splitting of a prime in a number field
- algebraic integers of $x^4 -10x^2 +1$
- Writing fractions in number fields with coprime numerator and denominator
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Introduction to jacobi modular forms
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Find the degree of the algebraic numbers
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- Direct product and absolut norm
- Splitting of primes in a Galois extension
Related Questions in EXTENSION-FIELD
- Field $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ with $\alpha=\sqrt[3]7+2i$
- $\overline{A}\simeq\overline{k}^n $ implies $A\simeq K_1\times\cdots\times K_r$
- Extension of field, $\Bbb{R}(i \pi) = \Bbb{C} $
- A field extension of degree $\leq 2$
- Field not separable
- Intersections of two primitive field extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$
- Fields generated by elements
- Find the degree of splitting field of a separable polynomial over finite field
- Eigenvalues of an element in a field extension
- When a product of two primitive elements is also primitive?
Related Questions in PRIME-FACTORIZATION
- For which natural numbers are $\phi(n)=2$?
- Fractions of the form $\frac{a}{k}\cdot\frac{b}{k}\cdot\frac{c}{k}\cdots=\frac{n}{k}$
- (Number of perfect powers ≤ n) ∼ $\sqrt{n}$?
- How do I solve complicated prime factorization problems? (Ex: 20711)
- Is there a pattern to addition of primesFactored numbers?
- Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic: Uniqueness Part of Proof
- Find a prime factor of $7999973$ without a calculator
- Proof verification: Let $gcd(x,y)=1$. If $xy$ is a perfect square, then $x$ and $y$ are perfect squares.
- An idea for approaching Brocard's problem ($n!+1=m^2$)
- Looking for complex roots of unity which also happen to be complex primes
Related Questions in CYCLOTOMIC-POLYNOMIALS
- On multiplicative and additive properties of cyclotomic polynomials
- Pythagorean-like equation for generalized hyperbolic function
- Solving $x^2+x+1=7^n$
- Question related to N-th cyclotomic polynomial, principal N-th root of unity and residue class of X
- Question about the uniqueness of the $n^\text{th}$ cylclotomic polynomial?
- What does $\varphi (n)$ denote in the context 'the class of $q$ modulo $n$ has order $\varphi (n)$'?
- Proving the identity $\Phi_{np}(x) = \Phi_n(x^p)/\Phi_n(x)$, with $p \nmid n$
- Is the image of $\Phi_n(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ in $\mathbb{F}_q[x]$ still a cyclotomic polynomial?
- Determine Minimal Polynomial of Primitive 10th Root of Unity
- Let $n \geq 3$ and let $p$ be prime. Show that $\sqrt[n]{p}$ is not contained in a cyclotomic extension of $\mathbb{Q}$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
After studying a bit more field theory I think I have an answer.
If I take $\omega\in\mathbb{Z}_q$ with order $m$, then if $q$ is large enough that the coefficients of $\phi_m(x)$ are unchanged my modding out by $q$ (which should be easy, since the coefficients are typically small) then $\phi_m(x)$ is unchanged in $\mathbb{Z}_q[x]$ and thus must contain all the primitive $m$th roots of unity as roots, which are all just powers of $\omega$. Thus: $$\phi_m(x)=\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}(x-\omega^k)\in\mathbb{Z}_q[x]$$
Then let $x\in \prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^k\rangle$. Since it's a product of elements of each of these ideals, it will have a factor of $q$ (so $x\in\langle q\rangle$) unless $x=\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}(\zeta-\omega^k)$. But then if I project $x$ into $\mathbb{Z}_q[\zeta]$, then it becomes $\overline{x}=\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}(\zeta-\omega^k)=\phi_m(\zeta)=0$ because $\zeta$ is defined as a root of this polynomial.
This gives two things: First, that $x\in\langle q\rangle$, so $\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^k\rangle\subseteq\langle q\rangle$. Second, define $p(x)=\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}(x-\omega^k)\in\mathbb{Z}[x]$, and then $p(\zeta)=qf(\zeta)$ for some $\zeta$.
Then for any $j\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*$, I can take $q\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*\setminus\{j\}}(\zeta-\omega^k) \in\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^k\rangle$. If I take one element like this for each $j\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*$ and add them together, it's still in the product ideal: $$g(\zeta)=\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}q\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*\setminus\{j\}}(\zeta-\omega^k) =q\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*\setminus\{j\}}(\zeta-\omega^k). $$ Consider just $\tilde{g}(x)=\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*\setminus\{j\}}(x-\omega^k)$, so that $g(x)=q\tilde{g}(x)$. Note that $\tilde{g}(x)$ is just the formal derivative of $p(x)$, and since the roots of $p(x)$ are all distinct, then $gcd(\tilde{g}(x),p(x))=1$. Since $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ is a Euclidean domain, there exists $a(x),b(x)$ such that $a(x)\tilde{g}(x)+b(x)p(x)=1$. Evaluated at $\zeta$ gives $a(\zeta)\tilde{g}(\zeta)+b(\zeta)p(\zeta)=1$, and multiplied by $q$: $$qa(\zeta)\tilde{g}(\zeta)+qb(\zeta)p(\zeta)=q$$ $$a(\zeta)g(\zeta)+(qb(\zeta))p(\zeta)=q$$ But since $g(\zeta),p(\zeta)\in\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^k\rangle$, which is an ideal, then multiplying them by $a(\zeta)$ and $qb(\zeta)$, then adding the products together, will still be in this ideal. So $q\in \prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^k\rangle$, and thus $\langle q\rangle\subseteq \prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^k\rangle$, so $$\langle q\rangle=\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}_m^*}\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^k\rangle.$$
Showing that they are coprime is actually straightforward: For any $j,k\in \mathbb{Z}_m^*$, let $$(\zeta-\omega^j)-(\zeta-\omega^k),q\in\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^k\rangle+\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^j\rangle$$ Then $(\zeta-\omega^j)-(\zeta-\omega^k)=\omega^k-\omega^j\in\mathbb{Z}$. Since $q$ is prime, then $gcd(\omega^k-\omega^j,q)=1$ so there are integers $a,b$ such that $$a(\omega^k-\omega^j)+bq=1$$ And thus $1$ is also in the ideal, so $\mathbb{Z}=\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^k\rangle+\langle q\rangle + \langle \zeta-\omega^j\rangle$