Why does Wolfram Alpha say that $\sqrt{1}=-1$?

Is this a mistake or what? Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance.
Why does Wolfram Alpha say that $\sqrt{1}=-1$?

Is this a mistake or what? Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance.
On
$-1$ is a perfectly valid square root of 1... think about it: $(-1)^2=1$, after all!
It is not what we usually call the "principle branch" of the square root, where you would expect to get 1.
On
There are two real values which are roots of $1$: $$(-1)^2 = (1)^2 = 1$$
Exactly one of those values, the non-negative root, is called the principal square root of $1$, and is the real value returned by the the square root function $f$: $$f: \mathbb R^{\geq 0} \to \mathbb R^{\geq 0},\quad f(x) = \sqrt x,\quad\text{where}\;f(1) = \sqrt 1 = 1$$
but $(-1)$ is also, by definition, a real (non-principal) root of $1$.
See also principal square root in Wikipedia.
On
By writing $\sqrt{x}$ with $x>0$ , you implicitly mean the principal square root which is always positive. This is called the square root of $x$.
There is always another (negative) number whose square is $x$, namely $-\sqrt{x}$, in your case $-1$. The wolfram alpha has made it clear by saying:
1 (real, principle root)
-1 (real root)
Did you read the results carefully? It does give $1$ as the answer:
It then helpfully mentions that $-1$ is also a 2nd root of $1$:
which is perfectly correct, because $(-1)^2=1$.