Why is a field conservative if its irrotational, and why is this equivalent to saying it is described by some potential function?

52 Views Asked by At

We were studying conservative fields today and I am a bit confused as to how the condition $ \nabla \times \vec F = 0 $, the field is irrotational, is equivalent to saying it is described by some function $f$ such that $F=-\nabla f$. Why is this the case. I dont see why the first reason is true, and much less why they are equivalent. I also don't see why the second case isn't true for all functions? If you integrate $F$, surely you can always find it gives a function $f$?