A poker deck has $52$ cards, $13$ ranks $\{A,2,...,10,J,Q,K\}$ and $4$ suits {diamond, club, heart, spade}. If $5$ cards are dealt, what is the probability that there is an ace of diamonds?
Here is my thinking: event over the sample space, which is event of getting (ace of diamonds)/ $\begin{pmatrix} 52 \\ 5 \end{pmatrix}$.
then for the event: _ _ _ _ _. We got 5 chances which is $\begin{pmatrix} 5 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}$, then for the ace of diamonds $\begin{pmatrix} 52 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} $since there is only one ace of a diamond from the $52$ cards. so $\frac{ \begin{pmatrix} 5 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 52 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}} {\begin{pmatrix} 52 \\ 5 \end{pmatrix}}$? is this right?
What about if we just count of the p(ace) and P(a diamond)? Thank you in advance.
You are on the right track. For the event, there's the ace of diamonds and some other $4$ cards from the remaining $51$, which can be chosen in $\binom{51}4$ ways. Hence, the answer is
$$\frac{\binom{51}4}{\binom{52}5}.$$
For just aces, the idea is similar, but a bit more complicated. We must consider cases. A hand of $5$ cards that contains an ace comes in four flavors:
It contains exactly one ace. Then we must choose one of four aces in $\binom 41$ ways and the remaining four cards from among the $48$ non-ace cards in $\binom{48}4$ ways.
It contains exactly two aces. Then we must choose two of four aces in $\binom 42$ ways and the remaining three cards from among the $48$ non-ace cards in $\binom{48}3$ ways.
It contains exactly three aces. Then we must choose three of four aces in $\binom 42$ ways and the remaining two cards from among the $48$ non-ace cards in $\binom{48}2$ ways.
It contains exactly four aces. Then we must choose four of four aces in $\binom 44$ ways and the remaining one card from among the $48$ non-ace cards in $\binom{48}1$ ways.
This gives us
$$\frac{\binom 41\binom{48}4 + \binom 42\binom{48}3 + \binom 43\binom{48}2 + \binom 44\binom{48}1}{\binom{52}5} = \frac1{\binom{52}5}\left(\sum_{k=1}^4\binom 4k \binom{48}{5-k}\right).$$
With this, do you think you can handle the case of just diamonds? It's similar.