A power series is an infinite series of the form
$$\sum_{n=1}^∞ a_n(x-c)^n.$$
And a function $f$ is analytic if it is locally given by a power series. Yet the formal definition of an analytic function is the following:
A function $f$ is analytic on an open set $D$ of the real line if for any $x_0∈D$ one can write
$$f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^∞ b_n(x-x_0)^n.$$
for coefficients $b_i∈ℝ$ and the series is convergent to $f(x)$ on a neighborhood of $x_0$.
Why isn't the definition simply
"$f$ is analytic on an open set $D$ of the real line if one can write
$$f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^∞ a_n(x-c)^n.$$
for some constant $c∈ℝ$, coefficients $a_i∈ℝ$ and all $x∈D$" ?
Since an analytic function is one that is "locally given by a power series", then I would think that the proper way to define an analytic function would be as shown in the example above. Why is this not the case?
Also, wouldn't it then be possible for a function to be given by a power series $\sum_{n=1}^∞ a_n(x-c)^n$ on an open set $D$, yet for that function not to comply with the former and correct definition of analytic?
I would really appreciate any help/thoughts.
With the actual definition ,for different $x_0$ in $D$ we might get different neighborhoods on which the function is represented by a power series centered at $x_0$.
In your simplified version $$ f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^∞ a_n(x-c)^n.$$ the role of $c$ is not clear.
Thus there is more to the definition of analytic functions than just being represented by a power series about one point $c$ of the region $D$.